O.C.G.A. § 42-8-111 (2019)
Court issuance of certificate for installation of ignition interlock devices; exceptions; completion of alcohol and drug use risk reduction program; notice of requirements; fees for driver’s license
(a) Upon a second or subsequent conviction of a resident of this state for violating Code Section 40-6-391 within five years, as measured from the dates of previous arrests for which convictions were obtained to the date of the current arrest for which a conviction is obtained, for which such person is granted probation, the court shall issue a certificate of eligibility for an ignition interlock device limited driving permit or probationary license, subject to the following conditions: (1) Such person shall have installed and shall maintain in each motor vehicle registered in such person’s name for a period of not less than one year a functioning, certified ignition interlock device; (2) Such person shall have installed and shall maintain in any other motor vehicle to be driven by such person for a period of not less than one year a functioning, certified ignition interlock device, and such person shall not drive any motor vehicle whatsoever that is not so equipped during such period. Upon successful completion of one year of monitoring of such ignition interlock device, the restriction for maintaining and using such ignition interlock device shall be removed, and the permit may be renewed for additional periods of two months as provided in paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of Code Section 40-5-64.1; and (3) Such person shall participate in a substance abuse treatment program as defined in paragraph (16.2) of Code Section 40-5-1, a drug court division in compliance with Code Section 15-1-15, a mental health court division in compliance with Code Section 15-1-16, a veterans court division in compliance with Code Section 15-1-17, or
an operating under the influence court division in compliance with Code Section 15-1-19 for a period of not less than 120 days. For the purposes of this subsection, a plea of nolo contendere shall constitute a conviction; and a conviction of any offense under the laws of any other state or territory of the United States which, if committed in this state, would be a violation of Code Section 40-6-391 shall be deemed a conviction of violating such Code section. (b) The court may, in its discretion, decline to issue a certificate of eligibility for an ignition interlock device limited driving permit or probationary license for any reason or exempt a person from any or all ignition interlock device requirements upon a determination that such requirements would subject such person to undue financial hardship. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of Code Section 40-13-32 or 40-13-33, a determination of financial hardship may be made at the time of conviction or any time thereafter. If a court grants an exemption from the ignition interlock device requirements, such person shall not be eligible for a limited driving permit or any other driving privilege for a period of one year. (c) In the case of any person subject to the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section, the court shall include in the record of conviction or violation submitted to the Department of Driver Services a copy of the certificate of eligibility for an ignition interlock device limited driving permit or probationary license issued by the court or documentation of the court’s decision to decline to issue such certificate. Such certificate shall specify any exemption from the installation requirements of paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section and any vehicles subject to the installation requirements of paragraph (2) of such subsection. The records of the Department of Driver Services shall contain a record reflecting such certificate, and the person’s driver’s license, limited driving permit, or probationary license shall contain a notation that the person may only operate a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning, certified ignition interlock device. (d) Except as provided in Code Sections 42-8-110.1 and 42-8-112, no provision of this article shall be deemed to reduce any period of driver’s license suspension or revocation otherwise imposed by law. (e) The fee for issuance of any driver’s license indicating that use of an ignition interlock device is required shall be as prescribed for a regular driver’s license in Code Section 40-5-25, and the fee for issuance of any limited driving permit indicating that use of an ignition interlock device is required shall be as prescribed in Code Section 40-5-64.1; except that, for habitual violators required to use an ignition interlock device as a condition of a probationary license, the fee shall be as prescribed for a probationary license in Code Section 40-5-58.
(f) Exemptions granted due to financial hardship pursuant to subsection (b) of this Code section shall be exempt from the subject matter jurisdiction limitations imposed in Code Sections 40-13-32 and 40-1333.
History
Code 1981, § 42-8-111, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 568, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 391, § 12; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1457, § 6; Ga. L. 2001, p. 208, § 1-8; Ga. L. 2002, p. 415, § 42; Ga. L. 2003, p. 140, § 42; Ga. L. 2005, p. 334, § 24-4/HB 501; Ga. L. 2011, p. 355, § 19/HB 269; Ga. L. 2012, p. 72, § 6/SB 236; Ga. L. 2012, p. 775, § 42/HB 942; Ga. L. 2013, p. 878, § 3/HB 407; Ga. L. 2016, p. 323, § 1-7/HB 205; Ga. L. 2016, p. 443, § 8-7/SB 367; Ga. L. 2018, p. 1112, § 42/SB 365.
Annotations
Cross references. Periods of suspension; conditions to return of license, § 40-5-63. Limited driving permits for certain offenders, § 40-5-64. Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2016, the “or” preceding “a veterans court division” in the middle of paragraph (a)(3) as enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 323, § 17/HB 205, effective July 1, 2017, was not given effect. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2023, “subsection (b) of this Code section”
was substituted for “paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of this Code section” in subsection (f). Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1999, p. 391, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “it is fitting to honor the memory of all victims of drunken driving and Heidi Marie Flye, Cathryn Nicole Flye, and Audrey Marie Flye in particular by strengthening the laws requiring the installation and use of ignition interlock devices.” Ga. L. 1999, p. 391, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “This Act shall be known and may be cited as ‘Heidi’s Law.’” Ga. L. 2013, p. 878, § 5/HB 407, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: “This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2013, and shall apply to offenses committed on or after such date.” Law reviews. For note on 1999 amendment to this Code section, see 16 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 200 (1999). For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 139 (2016).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Imposition of ignition interlock device on second-time DUI offender mandatory. - O.C.G.A. § 42-8-111 is plain and susceptible of only one natural and reasonable construction, and that is that “shall” means that there is no discretion in the trial court to consider whether to impose an ignition interlock device as a condition of probation for a second time DUI offender, absent a showing of financial hardship; accordingly, a trial court erred in not imposing that condition of probation on the defendant, who had previously been convicted of a DUI offense and who entered a negotiated plea to driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that the defendant was a less
safe driver in violation of O.C.G.A. § 406-391(a)(1). State v. Villella, 266 Ga. App. 499, 597 S.E.2d 563, 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 422 (2004). Failure to order. - Since defendant’s sentence imposed upon a conviction for driving under the influence was more lenient than permitted under O.C.G.A. § 42-8-111, in that the trial court failed to order the defendant to install an ignition interlock device, the defendant could not complain on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to order the installation of such a device. Winstead v. State, 280 Ga. 605, 632 S.E.2d 86, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 407 (2006).