O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-1-12 (2019)

Duty of division director to inform applicants of availability of veteran credit; rules and regulations for implementing veteran credit program

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be the duty of the division director to inform applicants taking the examination of the provisions of Code Sections 43-1-9 through 43-1-11 and Code Section 43-1-13. The division director shall make such rules and regulations as are necessary in order to carry out the terms of Code Sections 43-1-9 through 43-1-11 and Code Section 43-1-13.

History

Ga. L. 1960, p. 1172, § 4; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1898, § 3; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 43; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1706, § 19.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1981, p. 1898, § 5, not codified by

the General Assembly, provided that that Act, § 3 of which amended this Code section, was not to be applicable to the Georgia Real Estate Commission and its functions, powers, and duties.

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Purpose of provisions. - Intention of Ga. L. 1960, p. 1172, §§ 1-5 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 43-1-9 through 43-1-13) was to require that qualifying veterans be allowed a preference in grants of professional licenses or certificates of registration. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-21. Provisions mandatory, leaving board no discretion. - As each section employs the word “shall” in the statute’s

provisions, Ga. L. 1960, p. 1172, §§ 1-5 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 43-1-9 through 431-13) were mandatory and allows the board no discretion in application of preference points in appropriate cases. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-21. Veterans’ preference points should be credited to examination scores of eligible candidates for registration by the State Board of Examination, Qualifi-

cation, and Registration of Architects. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-21. Board should ascertain numerical score when “fail” grade is reported. - Board should consult with the board’s grading service to determine if a numeri-

cal score could be provided in those cases in which a “fail” grade is presently reported; the board might also consider the possibility of grading the board’s own examinations to determine a numerical score. 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-21.

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 67 C.J.S., Officers and Public Employees, § 48 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2014 · leading case: Green v. Georgia, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1304 (N.D. Ga. 2014).
Green v. Georgia, 51 F. Supp. 3d 1304 (N.D. Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “) He was sentenced to 30 years, two to serve and the balance on probation.”
Green v. Georgia, 987 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (N.D. Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “) He was sentenced to 30 years, two to serve and the balance on probation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.