Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this part, the term:
(Ga. L. 1977, p. 1194, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 819, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 3245, §§ 1, 2.)
- For annual survey of local government law, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 289 (2005). For note on 1992 amendment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 323 (1992).
Construction with §§ 44-12-131 and 44-12-137. - In resolving a statutory conflict between O.C.G.A. §§ 44-12-130(1) and44-12-137(a)(7) with respect to the one-month duration for a pawn transaction and O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131(a)(1) which required a duration of 30 days, it was determined that the criminal penalty in § 44-12-137(a)(7) was inapplicable to a customer's pawn transaction that satisfied the 30-day requirement of § 44-12-131(a)(1); the customer's action against the pawnbroker based on an illegal duration accordingly failed. Marshall v. Speedee Cash, 292 Ga. App. 790, 665 S.E.2d 888 (2008).
- Although O.C.G.A. §§ 44-12-130(5) and44-12-131(a)(3) grant the pawnbroker the right to self-help repossession upon default without the necessity of filing a lien, this remedy is intended to apply to the defaulting pledgor, not a bona fide purchaser for value with no notice of the pawnbroker's claim. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc. v. Gordon, 242 Ga. App. 73, 529 S.E.2d 138 (2000).
- Since the stated purpose of Gwinnett County, Ga., Ord. No. 82-11 was to impede the sale of stolen property, and its requirements were designed to achieve that end, it was a proper use of the county's police power, and was not in conflict with O.C.G.A. § 44-12-130 et seq. Pawnmart, Inc. v. Gwinnett County, 279 Ga. 19, 608 S.E.2d 639 (2005).
Cited in Bell v. Instant Car Title Loans (In re Bell), 279 Bankr. 890 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2002); In re Chastagner, 498 Bankr. 376 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2013).
- 54 Am. Jur. 2d, Moneylenders and Pawnbrokers, §§ 6, 7.
- 70 C.J.S., Pawnbrokers, § 2.
- Validity of statutes, ordinances, and regulations governing pawn shops, 16 A.L.R.6th 219.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-02-07
Citation: 608 S.E.2d 639, 279 Ga. 19, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 344, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 121
Snippet: the general law. In the present case, OCGA §§ 44-12-130 through 138 are general laws regulating Georgia
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-12-02
Citation: 524 S.E.2d 481, 271 Ga. 864, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4301, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1028
Snippet: 7-4-18, the criminal usury statute, and OCGA § 44-12-130 et seq., the pawnbroker statute, are in irreconcilable