Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 12-612, enacted by Ga. L. 1945, p. 189, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 819, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 3245, § 3; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 3.)
The 2000 amendment, effective July 1, 2000, and applicable with respect to notices delivered on or after July 1, 2000, substituted "certified mail or statutory overnight delivery" for "certified mail" in the first sentence of subparagraph (a)(7)(C).
- Criminal penalty for excessive interest, § 7-4-18.
- For note discussing transfer fees in home loan assumptions in reference to the Georgia usury laws, see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 454 (1975). For note on 1992 amendment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 323 (1992).
The terms "interest" and "pawnshop charges" are not synonymous or interchangeable, and both terms must be recognized as having individual importance within O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131. Fryer v. Easy Money Title Pawn, Inc., 183 Bankr. 654 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1995).
Construed with § 7-4-18. - There is no conflict between O.C.G.A. §§ 7-4-18 and44-12-131 since what is authorized by the pawnshop statute is a combination of charges up to 25% per month, not the imposition of interest alone at a rate of 25% per month. Fryer v. Easy Money Title Pawn, Inc., 183 Bankr. 654 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1995).
O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131, not O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18, the criminal usury statute, governs pawnshop transactions. Glinton v. And R, Inc., 271 Ga. 864, 524 S.E.2d 481 (1999).
O.C.G.A. §§ 7-4-18 and44-12-131, the criminal usury statute, are in conflict and cannot be reconciled. Hooks v. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc., 241 Ga. App. 305, 527 S.E.2d 566 (1999).
The amount of interest on a pawn transaction was regulated by O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131 and was not governed by the five percent limit imposed on general loans by the usury statute, O.C.G.A. § 7-4-18. Hooks v. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc., 241 Ga. App. 305, 527 S.E.2d 566 (1999).
Construction with §§ 44-12-130 and 44-12-137. - In resolving a statutory conflict between O.C.G.A. §§ 44-12-130(1) and44-12-137(a)(7) with respect to the one-month duration for a pawn transaction and O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131(a)(1) which required a duration of 30 days, it was determined that the criminal penalty in § 44-12-137(a)(7) was inapplicable to a customer's pawn transaction that satisfied the 30-day requirement of § 44-12-131(a)(1); the customer's action against the pawnbroker based on an illegal duration accordingly failed. Marshall v. Speedee Cash, 292 Ga. App. 790, 665 S.E.2d 888 (2008).
Pawnshop charges are expenses actually incurred by the pawnbroker in providing a service in connection with the transaction. Fryer v. Easy Money Title Pawn, Inc., 183 Bankr. 322 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1995).
- Pawnshop charge which included a 23% service charge for the customers use of the pawned automobile, the risk to the lender of that continued use, checking and processing the title to the automobile apparently in addition to an itemized title fee charged under the contract, verifying insurance on the automobile and making a log for the sheriff's department, constituted interest rather than pawnshop charges since it did not reimburse specific expenses actually incurred by the pawnbroker. Fryer v. Easy Money Title Pawn, Inc., 183 Bankr. 322 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1995).
- In single advance, single payment transactions in which the term is less than a year and equal to a whole number of months, pawnbroker-creditors may make the unit period determination in the alternative, that is, on the basis of the term as a number of months or on the basis of the term as a number of days. Hooks v. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc., 241 Ga. App. 305, 527 S.E.2d 566 (1999).
- Although O.C.G.A. §§ 44-12-130(5) and44-12-131(a)(3) grant the pawnbroker the right to self-help repossession upon default without the necessity of filing a lien, this remedy is intended to apply to the defaulting pledgor, not a bona fide purchaser for value with no notice of the pawnbroker's claim. Cobb Ctr. Pawn & Jewelry Brokers, Inc. v. Gordon, 242 Ga. App. 73, 529 S.E.2d 138 (2000).
- Bankruptcy court found that the creditor was not entitled to summary judgment regarding the debtor's repossessed vehicle action where the pawnshop agreement in issue violated the statutory requirements for automobile title pawns under Georgia law, O.C.G.A. § 44-14-130. Johnson v. Speedee Cash of Columbus, Inc. (In re Johnson), 289 Bankr. 251 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2002).
LLC that seized a Chapter 13 debtor's car 16 hours before the debtor declared bankruptcy, and sold the car without keeping records, was ordered to pay the debtor $6,579.57 for loss of the car, $300 for lost personal property that was in the car, $2,356.70 in emotional distress damages, and reasonable attorney's fees, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(k), because the evidence showed that the LLC knew the debtor declared bankruptcy before the LLC sold the car. Although the LLC claimed that the LLC was not liable under § 362 because the debtor forfeited rights in the car pursuant to the Georgia Pawnshop Act (GPA), O.C.G.A. § 44-14-403, when the debtor failed to repay a debt, the court rejected that argument because the LLC assessed interest rates over the course of the contract that exceeded the rates allowed by the GPA, such that a Motor Vehicle Pawn Contract the debtor signed was void from the contract's inception pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131. Spinner v. Cash In A Hurry, LLC (In re Spinner), 398 Bankr. 84 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2008).
- Pawnshop customer's action, alleging that a pawnshop failed to disclose all of the interest and charges that it assessed against the customer and against purported class members who were similarly situated, as required by O.C.G.A. § 44-12-138(b)(6) and (8), failed upon a finding that the pawnshop had made a good faith offer to avoid litigation by tendering to the customer a check in the amount collected beyond the principal, as required by O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131(a)(7)(A); accordingly, the court found that the customer had not sufficiently complied with the ante litem notice provisions with respect to the other members of the class, who were not sufficiently identified in order to allow a good faith offer to be made to them. Mack v. Ga. Auto Pawn, Inc., 262 Ga. App. 277, 585 S.E.2d 661 (2003).
Cited in Bell v. Instant Car Title Loans (In re Bell), 279 Bankr. 890 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2002); In re Chastagner, 498 Bankr. 376 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2013).
- When a motor vehicle is the subject of a pawn transaction, O.C.G.A. § 44-12-131(a) as it existed prior to the 1992 amendment authorized pawnbrokers to receive interest up to the rate of two percent per month on the principal, a pawnshop charge not limited by the "one-fourth of the principal amount" ceiling applicable to other pawn transactions, and a motor vehicle storage fee not to exceed $30.00 per day. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U89-28.
- 53A Am. Jur. 2d, Moneylenders and Pawnbrokers, § 46 et seq.
- 70 C.J.S., Pawnbrokers, § 5.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-12-02
Citation: 524 S.E.2d 481, 271 Ga. 864, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4301, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1028
Snippet: understanding that the 25 percent per month cap of OCGA § 44-12-131 (a) (4) (A) consists of a maximum five percent