O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34 (2019)
Utilities protection center; funding of activities; notice of work; delay; responsibility for completing safety requirements
(a) All utilities shall organize, participate as members in, and cooperate with the utilities protection center. In lieu of organizing a new center, if the organization defined as the utilities protection center in paragraph (21) of Code Section 25-9-2 undertakes to serve as the utilities protection center referred to in this part, it may do so and no duplicative center shall
thereafter be established. The activities of the center relating to high-voltage lines shall be funded by all utilities. (b) Where work is to be done, the person responsible for such work shall give notice to the utilities protection center during its regular business hours at least 72 hours, excluding weekends and holidays, prior to commencing such work and such notice shall: (1) Describe the tract or parcel of land upon which the work to be done is to take place with sufficient particularity to enable the owner or operator of the high-voltage lines to ascertain the precise tract or parcel of land involved; (2) State the name, address, and telephone number of the person who will be in charge of the work; (3) Describe the type of work to be engaged in by the person; and (4) Designate the date upon which the work will commence and will be completed. (c) After receipt of the notice required by subsection (b) of this Code section, the owner or operator of the high-voltage line shall contact the person whose name is given as required by paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of this Code section within a reasonable time, so that appropriate satisfactory arrangements can be made for the completion of the safety precautions required by Code Section 46-3-33, including coordination of work schedules and payment of costs required to effect such safety precautions. Upon completion of such arrangements, the owner or operator of such high-voltage line shall effect such safety precautions within a reasonable time. (d) If, after such arrangements are made, a delay in commencing the work is encountered, then the person responsible for the work shall be required to give a new notice as specified in subsection (b) of this Code section. (e) The person responsible for the work shall be responsible to assure that the safety requirements of Code Section 46-3-33 are completed prior to the commencement of any such work.
History
(Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 5; Code 1981, § 46-3-33; Code 1981, § 46-3-34, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2141, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 4, § 46.)
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 1992, p. 2141, § 1, redesignated former Code Section 46-3-34 as present Code Section 46-3-35. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Meaning of section. - Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 5 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34) means that for
a construction work risk to be brought within the duty owed by the owner and
maintainer of the high-voltage lines, then the notice required by that section must have been given by the responsible party. Carden v. Georgia Power Co., 231 Ga. 406, 202 S.E.2d 55 (1973). Construction. - There is no doubt engendered by O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34 about the necessity of giving notice prior to working in proximity to high-voltage power lines or about the effect of failing to give notice. Thus, persons of common intelligence need not guess at the meaning of that section, and, once in the possession of the necessary facts, should not differ as to its application. Santana v. Georgia Power Co., 269 Ga. 127, 498 S.E.2d 521 (1998). Duty where notice of work risk given. - Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 5 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34) places duty upon owner and maintainer of high-voltage lines where notice is given of a construction work risk although such owner would otherwise not be liable. Carden v. Georgia Power Co., 231 Ga. 406, 202 S.E.2d 55 (1973). The phrase ‘‘person responsible for the work to be done’’ is defined in O.C.G.A. § 46-3-30(2) and, when read in conjunction with subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34, requires the person or persons immediately responsible for the operation of machinery within eight feet of a high-voltage line to give notice. Green v. Moreland, 200 Ga. App. 167, 407 S.E.2d 119 (1991). Electric membership corporation could not be absolved of liability even in the absence of statutory notice, where it had not been shown as a matter of law that its lines were properly located and maintained at the time of a fatal accident. Three Notch Elec. Membership Corp. v. Bush, 190 Ga. App. 858, 380 S.E.2d 720, cert. denied, 190 Ga. App. 897, 380 S.E.2d 720 (1989). Activities of employee not constituting contributory negligence. - A mere employee of a construction company, not having notification responsibility under Ga. L. 1960, p. 181, § 5 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34), cannot be contributorily negligent as a matter of law just because the employee performed activities within the prohibited eight feet from high-voltage lines. Carden v. Georgia Power Co., 231 Ga. 406, 202 S.E.2d 55 (1973). Duty to give notice. - City could not be held liable under the High-voltage Safety
Act, O.C.G.A. § 46-3-30 et seq., for injuries to workers where the notice required by O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34 was not given. Callaway v. Crown Crafts, Inc., 223 Ga. App. 297, 477 S.E.2d 435 (1996). Power company not liable if notice not given. - Defendant power company could not be held responsible for injuries that occurred during painting of apartment building, where neither the power company nor the utilities protection center was notified of the work as required by statute. Santana v. Georgia Power Co., 269 Ga. 127, 498 S.E.2d 521 (1998). Assumption of the risk did not apply as a defense to a farm worker’s death by electrocution since there was no evidence to show that the farm worker appreciated the danger of the sagging power lines; despite the fact that the power company failed to maintain or inspect its power lines, it was immune from liability since it had no notice that the deceased was working within 10 feet of its lines. Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 255 Ga. App. 668, 566 S.E.2d 356 (2002), aff ’d, 276 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003). Lack of notice of risk to power company insignificant where lines are not properly located or maintained. - Although an employee as well as his employer may in some circumstances be a ‘‘person responsible’’ for notifying the line owner or operator under §§ 46-3-30, 46-3-32 and this section, lack of such notification is a bar to recovery only where the lines are ‘‘otherwise properly located and maintained.’’ Malvarez v. Georgia Power Co., 250 Ga. 568, 300 S.E.2d 145 (1983), superceded by statute as stated in Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 279 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003). One whose injury is caused by negligent installation or maintenance of high-voltage lines, even where such injury occurs while engaged in acts enumerated in § 46-3-32 within eight feet of the lines, is not barred by failure to give notice. Malvarez v. Georgia Power Co., 250 Ga. 568, 300 S.E.2d 145 (1983), superceded by statute as stated in Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 279 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003); Habersham Elec. Membership Corp. v. Dalton, 170 Ga. App. 483, 317 S.E.2d 312 (1984). Where a victim was electrocuted from
overhead power lines, and notwithstanding the existence of evidence that the utility companies may not have forwarded calls for protection, because of the general contractor’s cancellation of overhead protection, it was incumbent upon the general contractor to provide the utility companies with the 72-hours notice as required by O.C.G.A. § 46-3-34(d); thus, the utility companies were not liable. Jackson Elec. Mbrshp. Corp. v. Smith, 276 Ga. 208, 576 S.E.2d 878 (2003). Georgia High-voltage Safety Act, O.C.G.A. § 46-3-30 et seq., barred recovery in a wrongful death action as the decedent failed to give the statutory notice that decedent would be working within 10 feet of a sagging power line with which decedent came into contact and which electrocuted the decedent. Williams v. Mitchell County Elec. Mbrshp. Corp., 276 Ga. 759, 582 S.E.2d 107 (2003). New notice required if project delayed. - Under the plain language of O.C.G.A.
§ 46-3-34(d), which controls notice to the Utilities Protection Center, Inc. (UPC), if there is a delay in the work, new notice to the UPC is required prior to initiating a project. Jackson Elec. Mbrshp. Corp. v. Smith, 276 Ga. 208, 576 S.E.2d 878 (2003). Cited in Georgia Power Co. v. Carden, 128 Ga. App. 347, 196 S.E.2d 477 (1973); Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. v. Johnson, 161 Ga. App. 634, 288 S.E.2d 320 (1982); Brown v. City of Fitzgerald, 177 Ga. App. 859, 341 S.E.2d 476 (1986); Butler v. Georgia Power Co., 183 Ga. App. 144, 358 S.E.2d 266 (1987); Lynch v. Georgia Power Co., 185 Ga. App. 256, 363 S.E.2d 777 (1987); Santana v. First Guaranty Mgt. Corp., 223 Ga. App. 472, 477 S.E.2d 857 (1996); Preston v. Georgia Power Co., 227 Ga. App. 449, 489 S.E.2d 573 (1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 869, 119 S. Ct. 163, 142 L. Ed. 2d 134 (1998).
RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Duty to guard against danger to children by electric wires, 41 ALR 1337; 49 ALR 1053; 100 ALR 621. Duty of public utility to notify patron in advance of temporary suspension of service, 52 ALR 1078. Liability of electric light or power com-
pany for injury or damage due to condition of service lines or electrical appliance maintained by one to whom it furnishes electric current, 134 ALR 507. Liability of electric power or telephone company for injury or damage by lightning transmitted on wires, 25 ALR2d 722.