Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(c.1)Tangible real property which qualifies as landmark historic property pursuant to the provisions of Code Section 48-5-7.3 shall be assessed at 40 percent of its fair market value and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of the property's fair market value.For the purposes of this subsection, the term "fair market value" shall mean the fair market value of landmark historic property pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph (D) of paragraph (3) of Code Section 48-5-2.
(c.2)Tangible real property which is devoted to bona fide conservation uses as defined in this chapter and which otherwise conforms to the conditions and limitations imposed in this chapter shall be assessed for property tax purposes at 40 percent of its current use value and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of the property's current use value.
(c.3)Tangible real property located in a transitional developing area which is devoted to bona fide residential uses and which otherwise conforms to the conditions and limitations imposed in this chapter for bona fide residential transitional property shall be assessed for property tax purposes at 40 percent of its current use value and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of the property's current use value.
(c.4)Tangible real property which qualifies as brownfield property pursuant to the provisions of Code Section 48-5-7.6 shall be assessed at 40 percent of its fair market value and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of the property's fair market value. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "fair market value" shall mean the fair market value of brownfield property pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph (F) of paragraph (3) of Code Section 48-5-2.
(Ga. L. 1851-52, p. 288, § 14; Code 1863, § 734; Code 1868, § 801; Code 1873, § 804; Code 1882, § 804; Civil Code 1895, § 770; Ga. L. 1909, p. 36, § 1; Civil Code 1910, § 1010; Code 1933, § 92-5703; Ga. L. 1968, p. 358, § 2; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1102, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 1083, § 1; Ga. L. 1976, p. 518, § 1; Code 1933, § 91A-1019, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 5, § 26; Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, § 2; Ga. L. 1989, p. 1585, § 2; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1122, § 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 4; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 48; Ga. L. 2003, p. 170, § 2; Ga. L. 2018, p. 119, § 3/HB 85.)
- Ga. L. 2018, p. 119, § 7/HB 85, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "(a) This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2019, only if an amendment to the Constitution of Georgia is ratified at the November, 2018, general election modifying constitutional prescriptions for forest land conservation use property and related assistance grants, permitting the withholding of a portion of assistance grants to provide for certain state administrative costs, and establishing qualified timberland property as a subclassification of tangible property for purposes of ad valorem taxation.
"(b) If such an amendment to the Constitution is not so ratified, then this Act shall not become effective and shall stand repealed by operation of law on January 1, 2019." If the amendment is ratified, subsections (c.5) and (c.6) will read as follows: "(c.5) Tangible real property which qualifies as forest land conservation use property pursuant to the provisions of Code Section 48-5-7.7 shall be assessed at 40 percent of its forest land conservation use value and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of the property's forest land conservation use value.
"(c.6) Tangible real property which qualifies as qualified timberland property in accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of this chapter shall be assessed at 40 percent of its fair market value of qualified timberland property and shall be taxed on a levy made by each respective tax jurisdiction according to 40 percent of its fair market value of qualified timberland property as such value is determined by the commissioner in accordance with Article 13 of this chapter." Until the ratification and January 1, 2019, there are no subsections (c.5) and (c.6).
The 2018 amendment added subsections (c.5) and (c.6). For effective date of this amendment, see the delayed effective date note.
- Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, § 1, effective April 8, 1983, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that: "It is the intent of this Act to implement certain changes imposed by Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III, subparagraph (c) of the Constitution of the State of Georgia."
Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, § 4, effective April 8, 1983, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that that Act ( § 2 of which amended this Code section) "shall apply to all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1984."
Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 15, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, with respect to ad valorem taxation of timber and shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, for all other purposes. Taxation for prior periods shall continue to be governed by prior law.
The state-wide referendum (Ga. L. 2002, p. 1017, § 2), which would have added a new subsection (c.4), relating to exemption from ad valorem taxation for commercial dockside facilities, was defeated at the November 2002, general election.
- For note on the 1989 amendment to this Code section, see 6 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 173 (1989).
Statute is not unconstitutional for vagueness of the term "fair market value." Chilivis v. Backus, 236 Ga. 88, 222 S.E.2d 371 (1976).
- Setting the assessed value of tangible property at 40 percent of fair market value is not in conflict with the Georgia Constitution. Salem v. Tattnall County, 250 Ga. 881, 302 S.E.2d 99 (1983).
- Under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.2, an owner needed only to complete the rehabilitation of property within 24 months in order to be allowed to apply for and obtain certification of the property as rehabilitated historic property for purposes of preferential assessment under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7(c) and there was no statutory basis that the owner obtain final certification from the Department of Natural Resources within that two year time frame. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Emmoth, 278 Ga. 144, 598 S.E.2d 495 (2004).
- Assessment of property at 40% of value did not violate the constitutional requirement of uniformity, even though statistical evidence showed the average level of assessment of other property to be 38.84% of fair market value or lower. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. Henry County Bd. of Assessors, 217 Ga. App. 699, 458 S.E.2d 705 (1995).
- Words "assessed value" in Ga. Const. 1945, Art. VIII, Sec. XII, Para. I (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VIII, Sec. VI, Para. I) mean the correctly assessed value, that is, the assessed value approved by the commissioner, not an incorrectly assessed value. Board of Comm'rs v. Allgood, 234 Ga. 9, 214 S.E.2d 522 (1975).
Because a beneficial property owner only benefitted from a lower ad valorem tax in proportion to the interest owned in the property, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to a corporation, as approval of preferential ad valorem tax treatment for property co-owned by the shareholders of the corporation by a tenancy in common did not violate O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4(b)(3), as an individual's benefit was to be determined on a pro-rata basis; thus, if the interests of shareholders who were tenants in common of the property were so calculated, no single shareholder would have benefitted from current use assessment as to more than 2,000 acres. Effingham County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Samwilka, Inc., 278 Ga. App. 521, 629 S.E.2d 501 (2006).
Under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4, the owners of "bona fide conservation use property," including property used for certain agricultural purposes and meeting other statutory criteria and conditions, may apply to the county board of tax assessors for "current use assessment" of their property for purposes of calculating ad valorem taxes. If the application is granted, the property is assessed for tax purposes at 40 percent of the property's "current use value" instead of 40 percent of the property's "fair market value," under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7(a) and (c.2), thus resulting in tax savings. Morrison v. Claborn, 294 Ga. App. 508, 669 S.E.2d 492 (2008).
- Trial court erred by holding that operating a commercial grain business on property designated conservation use property under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4 did not constitute a breach of the conservation use covenant because the court failed to make any findings as to whether the grain business was incidental and not detrimental to the qualifying use of the property. Terrell County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Goolsby, 324 Ga. App. 535, 751 S.E.2d 158 (2013).
- Basic requirement, whether the property is returnable to the comptroller general (now commissioner) or to the tax receivers of the several counties, is that all property shall be returned and assessed at the property's fair market value. Ogletree v. Woodward, 150 Ga. 691, 105 S.E. 243 (1920).
Property is not ordinarily deemed as taxed until tax has been levied since the word "taxation" ordinarily includes a determination of the rate of levy and imposition of the levy, as an essential part of the sovereign power and process, it follows that property will not ordinarily be deemed as taxed until the tax has been levied. Rayle Elec. Membership Corp. v. Cook, 195 Ga. 734, 25 S.E.2d 574 (1943).
- It is not necessary that the owner of a debt should return it at more than its fair market value, and the fact that the debt is valued, with other debts, at a gross amount, and the whole thus returned, can make no difference, provided the value placed upon them is what the taxpayer believes to be their fair market value. Lewis v. Horne, 44 Ga. 627 (1872).
- An assessment of a penalty for a breach of a conservation use covenant is an assessment for which a property owner has the right to appeal pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-5-311. Oconee County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Thomas, 282 Ga. 422, 651 S.E.2d 45 (2007).
- Trial court did not err by denying a group of property owners their request for mandamus relief in the nature of finding that the county board of tax assessors certified their property tax appeals because it was undisputed that the tax appeals were physically delivered to the trial court and that it had ruled that such appeals were certified to it, thus, the property owners received the relief sought regarding certification. Newton Timber Co., L.L.L.P. v. Monroe County Bd. of Tax Assessors, Ga. , 755 S.E.2d 770 (2014).
Cited in Fulton County v. Strickland, 251 Ga. 473, 306 S.E.2d 299 (1983); Ga. Power Co. v. Monroe County, 284 Ga. App. 707, 644 S.E.2d 882 (2007).
- 72 Am. Jur. 2d, State and Local Taxation, §§ 689, 731.
- 84 C.J.S., Taxation, § 449 et seq.
- Construction and application of statute prohibiting or restricting reassessment after assessment and payment of taxes, 85 A.L.R. 107.
Original cost of construction or reproduction cost as proper factors in assessing real property for taxation, 104 A.L.R. 790.
Different parts or parcels of land in same ownership as single unit or separate units for tax assessment purposes, 133 A.L.R. 524.
Real-estate tax equalization, reassessment, or revaluation program commenced but not completed within the year, as violative of constitutional provisions requiring equal and uniform taxation, 76 A.L.R.2d 1077.
Tax assessor's civil liability to taxpayer for excessive or improper assessment of real property, 82 A.L.R.2d 1148.
Income or rental value as a factor in evaluation of real property for purposes of taxation, 96 A.L.R.2d 666.
Judicial notice as to assessed valuations, 42 A.L.R.3d 1439.
Total Results: 7
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-10
Citation: 295 Ga. 29, 755 S.E.2d 770, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 442, 2014 WL 902258, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 189
Snippet: application (“CUYA”) for 18 different parcels. See OCGA § 48-5-7. 4 The number “2008” was handwritten
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-03-19
Citation: 723 S.E.2d 901, 290 Ga. 705, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 952, 2012 WL 932026, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 297
Snippet: service pertaining to various government entities); 48-5-7.6(e)(1)(B) (regarding taxation of certain property
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-09-24
Citation: 282 Ga. 422, 651 S.E.2d 45, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 2919, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 592
Snippet: be appealed to the Board of Equalization. OCGA § 48-5-7.4 (j) (1). See also Department of Revenue Reg.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-06-28
Citation: 598 S.E.2d 495, 278 Ga. 144, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2126, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 538
Snippet: This appeal involves the interpretation of OCGA § 48-5-7.2, which provides for the certification of property
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-05-24
Citation: 597 S.E.2d 114, 277 Ga. 850, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1710, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 411
Snippet: understanding was incorrect, contending OCGA § 48-5-7.4 (n) (3) allows early termination without penalty
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-09-09
Citation: 251 Ga. 473, 306 S.E.2d 299, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 846
Snippet: the fair market value of taxable property. OCGA § 48-5-7(a) (Code Ann. § 91A-1019). Fulton County filed
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-05-03
Citation: 302 S.E.2d 99, 250 Ga. 881, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 681
Snippet: error questions the constitutionality of OCGA § 48-5-7 (a) (Code Ann. § 91A-1019): "Taxable tangible property