Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this article, the term:
provided that these rights and responsibilities shall be exercised subject to the powers, rights, duties, and responsibilities of the guardian of the person of the child and subject to any residual parental rights and responsibilities. These rights shall be subject to judicial oversight and review pursuant to Code Section 15-11-212.
(Ga. L. 1963, p. 81, § 3; Ga. L. 1982, p. 706, §§ 2, 6-8; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1720, § 16; Ga. L. 1991, p. 408, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1983, § 25; Ga. L. 1994, p. 97, § 49; Ga. L. 2004, p. 645, § 7; Ga. L. 2007, p. 590, § 3/HB 153; Ga. L. 2008, p. 1145, § 1/HB 984; Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 4-54/HB 242; Ga. L. 2015, p. 552, § 5/SB 138.)
The 2013 amendment, effective January 1, 2014, substituted "dependent children" for "deprived children" in subparagraph (3)(B); substituted "'Dependent child or youth'" for "'Deprived child or youth'" in paragraph (5); substituted "Code Section 15-11-212" for "Code Section 15-11-55" in the last sentence of paragraph (12); and substituted "dependency" for "deprivation" twice in paragraph (16). See editor's note for applicability.
The 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, added paragraphs (1) and (2); redesignated former paragraphs (1) through (5) as present paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively; deleted former paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), each of which read "Reserved."; redesignated former paragraph (9) as present paragraph (8); deleted former paragraph (9.1), which read "Reserved."; redesignated former paragraphs (10) through (16) as present paragraphs (9) through (15), respectively; and added paragraph (16).
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1991, a hyphen was deleted from the phrase "child care" in subparagraph (3)(F).
- Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 5-1/HB 242, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2014, and shall apply to all offenses which occur and juvenile proceedings commenced on and after such date. Any offense occurring before January 1, 2014, shall be governed by the statute in effect at the time of such offense and shall be considered a prior adjudication for the purpose of imposing a disposition that provides for a different penalty for subsequent adjudications, of whatever class, pursuant to this Act. The enactment of this Act shall not affect any prosecutions for acts occurring before January 1, 2014, and shall not act as an abatement of any such prosecutions."
- Visitation rights of a parent of a child in the custody of the Department of Family and Children Services are a residual "parental tie" which is not severed by the mere placement of the child in the temporary custody of the department without a specific finding as to that right. In re K.B., 188 Ga. App. 199, 372 S.E.2d 476 (1988).
Once temporary legal custody of a child was placed in the department under a shelter care order, the sole right to determine where and with whom the child would live vested with the department; the direction of the trial court to remove the child from the father's home was not binding, and the trial court's later contempt finding based on this order was improper. In re Tidwell, 279 Ga. App. 734, 632 S.E.2d 690 (2006).
§ 15-11-55. - Juvenile court erred in awarding legal custody of two children to the Department of Family and Children Services (DFACS) and then ordering that physical custody be given to the maternal grandparents as: (1) once legal custody of a deprived child has been granted to DFACS, the juvenile court cannot dictate physical custody; (2) nothing in O.C.G.A. § 15-11-55(a)(2) allowed any redefinition of legal custody as defined in O.C.G.A. § 49-5-3(12); (3) using the rules of construction, § 15-11-55(a)(2) followed the statutory and legal precedent that the grant of legal custody to DFACS included the right to determine physical custody; and (4) the 2003 amendment to § 15-11-55 did not reject the statutory definition of legal custody. In the Interest of A.N., 281 Ga. 58, 636 S.E.2d 496 (2006).
Nothing in O.C.G.A. § 15-11-55(a)(2) allows any redefinition of legal custody as defined in O.C.G.A. § 49-5-3(12). Instead, § 15-11-55(a)(2) follows the statutory and legal precedent that the grant of legal custody to the Department of Family and Children Services includes the right to determine physical custody; the 2003 amendment to § 15-11-55 does not reject the statutory definition of legal custody. In the Interest of A.N., 281 Ga. 58, 636 S.E.2d 496 (2006).
- Juvenile court exceeded the court's authority when the court awarded joint legal and physical custody of a deprived child jointly with the Department of Human Resources (DHR) and unrelated third parties when the DHR objected to such arrangement. In re J.N.T., 212 Ga. App. 498, 441 S.E.2d 918 (1994).
- Trial court erred in ordering the Department of Family and Children's Services (DFACS) to remove a foster child from the care of the child's foster parent because the order improperly infringed upon the authority of DFACS to determine the physical placement of children within the department's custody; DFACS had legal custody of the child since the child was born, and DFACS, as legal custodian, stood in loco parentis and had all legal rights of a natural parent, including the benefit of a prima facie right to custody. In re Goudeau, 305 Ga. App. 718, 700 S.E.2d 688 (2010).
Cited in Frances Wood Wilson Found., Inc. v. Bell, 223 Ga. 588, 157 S.E.2d 287 (1967); In re R.D., 141 Ga. App. 843, 234 S.E.2d 680 (1977); W.F. v. State, 144 Ga. App. 523, 241 S.E.2d 631 (1978); In re M.A.F., 254 Ga. 748, 334 S.E.2d 668 (1985); Brown v. Phillips, 178 Ga. App. 316, 342 S.E.2d 786 (1986); Ledford v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 189 Ga. App. 866, 377 S.E.2d 693 (1989).
- 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Juvenile Courts and Delinquent and Dependent Children, § 20 et seq. 79 Am. Jur. 2d, Welfare Laws, §§ 19, 20.
- 43 C.J.S., Infants, § 15.
Total Results: 5
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-04
Citation: 281 Ga. 58, 636 S.E.2d 496
Snippet: materia with OCGA § 49-5-3 (12) (A) does not support this finding. OCGA § 49-5-3 (12) (A) and (D) state
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-04
Citation: 636 S.E.2d 496
Snippet: pari materia with OCGA § 49-5-3(12)(A) does not support this finding. OCGA § 49-5-3(12)(A) and (D) state
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-03-01
Citation: 260 Ga. 25, 389 S.E.2d 211, 1990 Ga. LEXIS 72
Snippet: which requires “child caring institutions,” OCGA § 49-5-3 (1), to be licensed to operate by the Georgia Department
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1985-10-01
Citation: 254 Ga. 748, 334 S.E.2d 668, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 858
Snippet: exists to the contrary.” (emphasis supplied); OCGA § 49-5-3 (11), and c) the fact that we have equated those
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1985-10-01
Citation: 334 S.E.2d 668, 254 Ga. 748
Snippet: exists to the contrary." (emphasis supplied); OCGA § 49-5-3 (11), and c) the fact that we have equated those