CopyCited 53 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 10, 2005 | 607 S.E.2d 546
...of disposition permitting the infants to remain with their parents (hereinafter “appellants”), subject to conditions and limitations prescribed by the court, including supervision by the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS). See OCGA§
15-11-55 (a) (1)....
CopyCited 42 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 5, 2009 | 686 S.E.2d 635, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3148
...designed to reunite the child with the parent or parents; or
(5) The parent has been convicted of the murder of the child’s other parent,
(c) If the court does not make an order of termination of parental rights, it may grant an order under Code Section
15-11-55 if the court finds from clear and convincing evidence that the child is a deprived child.
CopyCited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 4, 2006 | 636 S.E.2d 496
...*59conditions and limitations on DFACS’ legal custody, including a limitation that physical custody of the child be placed in accordance with the court’s mandate. In the alternative, the juvenile court found that, even if OCGA §§
15-11-58 and
15-11-55 prevented it from dividing custody of a deprived child in this manner, these statutory provisions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution....
...ysical custody is “merely exhortatory and not binding.” (Punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of R. D.,
141 Ga. App. 843, 844 (234 SE2d 680) (1977). Despite the consistency of this case law, the juvenile court found that amendments made to OCGA §
15-11-55 in 2003 altered this well-settled precept....
...as expressed in OCGA §
49-5-3 (12), the concept of legal custody must be interpreted to include the “right to determine where and with whom [the child] shall live.” OCGA §
49-5-3 (12) (D).
With this in mind, the juvenile court found that OCGA §
15-11-55 (a) (2) is not controlled by this accepted definition of legal custody....
...nd that a juvenile court cannot grant legal custody to DFACS and then mandate the placement of physical custody in a party of the court’s choosing. The juvenile court has no authority to ignore this case law. Moreover, the explicit language of OCGA§
15-11-55 (a) (2) makes the juvenile court’s interpretation of the statute untenable....
...ry condition regarding retransfer of physical custody makes sense, as it is necessary to convey to the trial court authority that it would not otherwise have over the placement of physical custody.
Furthermore, nothing in the 2003 amendment to OCGA §
15-11-55 supports the juvenile court’s finding that the legislature intended to reject the definition of legal custody set forth in OCGA *61§
49-5-3....
...disposition, “a reasonably diligent search for a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child” be conducted within 90 days from the date the child is removed from his or her home. OCGA §
15-11-55 (a) (2) (D)....
...This language simply does not address the standard definition of legal custody in any way, either explicitly or implicitly. Therefore, it does not follow that this amendment provides any grounds to circumvent the applicable case law directly on point.
In support of its conclusions, the juvenile court also held that OCGA §
15-11-55 (c) supported its holding that it could grant legal custody to DFACS and place physical custody elsewhere....
...y of DFACS, see OCGA §
15-11-58, while not providing such services to parents whose children were placed in the legal custody of “a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child.” OCGA §
15-11-55 (a) (2) (D).1
The “protection provided in the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution is coextensive with that provided in Art....
...arding placement and custody of the deprived children in this case must be reversed, and this case is remanded for the juvenile court to determine custody in a manner consistent with this opinion.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
OCGA §
15-11-55 (a) (2) provides that, prior to transferring temporary legal custody to DFACS, “a reasonably diligent search for a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child shall be conduc...
CopyCited 15 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 29, 2018 | 304 Ga. 114
...ding as to whether such deprivation is the result of alcohol abuse or drug abuse by a parent or guardian.
(c) Disposition. The court shall proceed immediately or at a postponed hearing to make a proper disposition of the case in accordance with Code Section
15-11-55 if the court finds from clear and convincing evidence that the child is deprived.
See Ga....
CopyCited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 29, 2018
...“good cause” arose not from statute, but from Uniform Juvenile Court Rule
(“UJCR”) 11.3, which states, as it did in 2007, that upon motion “the court may
continue a hearing for a reasonable time upon good cause shown.”17 In the
15-11-55 if the court finds from clear and convincing evidence that the child is
deprived.
See Ga....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 5, 2009
...lan designed to reunite the child with the parent or parents; or (5) The parent has been convicted of the murder of the child's other parent. (c) If the court does not make an order of termination of parental rights, it may grant an order under Code Section
15-11-55 if the court finds from clear and convincing evidence that the child is a deprived child.
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 4, 2006
...o place conditions and limitations on DFACS' legal custody, including a limitation that physical custody of the child be placed in accordance with the court's mandate. In the alternative, the juvenile court found that, even if OCGA §§
15-11-58 and
15-11-55 prevented it from dividing custody of a deprived child in this manner, these statutory provisions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution....
...of physical custody is "merely exhortatory and not binding." (Punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of R.D.,
141 Ga.App. 843, 844,
234 S.E.2d 680 (1977). Despite the consistency of this case law, the juvenile court found that amendments made to OCGA §
15-11-55 in 2003 altered this well-settled precept....
...custody as expressed in OCGA §
49-5-3(12), the concept of legal custody must be interpreted to include the "right to determine where and with whom [the child] shall live." OCGA §
49-5-3(12)(D). With this in mind, the juvenile court found that OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(2) is not controlled by this accepted definition of legal custody....
...und that a juvenile court cannot grant legal custody to DFACS and then mandate the placement of physical custody in a party of the court's choosing. The juvenile court has no authority to ignore this case law. Moreover, the explicit language of OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(2) makes the juvenile court's interpretation of the statute untenable....
...ory condition regarding retransfer of physical custody makes sense, as it is necessary to convey to the trial court authority that it would not otherwise have over the placement of physical custody. Furthermore, nothing in the 2003 amendment to OCGA §
15-11-55 supports the juvenile court's finding that the legislature intended to reject the definition of legal custody set forth in OCGA §
49-5-3....
...of disposition, "a reasonably diligent search for a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child" be conducted within 90 days from the date the child is removed from his or her home. OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(2)(D)....
...This language simply does not address the standard definition of legal custody in any way, either explicitly or implicitly. Therefore, it does not follow that this amendment provides any grounds to circumvent the applicable case law directly on point. In support of its conclusions, the juvenile court also held that OCGA §
15-11-55(c) supported its holding that it could grant legal custody to DFACS and place physical custody elsewhere....
...stody of DFACS, see OCGA §
15-11-58, while not providing such services to parents whose children were placed in the legal custody of "a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child." OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(2)(D)....
...For all of these reasons, the rulings of the juvenile court regarding placement and custody of the deprived children in this case must be reversed, and this case is remanded for the juvenile court to determine custody in a manner consistent with this opinion. Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(2) provides that, prior to transferring temporary legal custody to DFACS, "a reasonably diligent search for a parent or relative of the child or other persons who have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to the child shall be conducted...
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 10, 2005 | 278 Ga. 859
...[1] At that time the court entered an order of disposition permitting the infants to remain with their parents (hereinafter "appellants"), subject to conditions and limitations prescribed by the court, including supervision by the Department of Family and Children Services (DFCS). See OCGA §
15-11-55(a)(1)....