Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 5-3-5 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 5 APPEAL AND ERROR

Section 3. Appeals to Superior or State Court, 5-3-1 through 5-3-31.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

5-3-5. Appeal by one of several plaintiffs or defendants - Effect of judgment on appeal generally; recovery of damages awarded upon appeal.

Upon the appeal of either party plaintiff or defendant, as provided in Code Section 5-3-4, the whole record shall be taken up and all shall be bound by the final judgment; but, in case damages are awarded upon such appeal, the damages shall only be recovered against the party appealing and his security, if any, and not against the party failing or refusing to appeal.

(Laws 1839, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 500; Code 1863, § 3540; Code 1868, § 3563; Code 1873, § 3620; Code 1882, § 3620; Civil Code 1895, § 4462; Civil Code 1910, § 5007; Code 1933, § 6-111.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Whole record brought up.

- By former Civil Code 1895, §§ 4462 and 4469 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 5-3-5 and5-3-29), appeal brings up whole record, and a party not appealing can make amendments to a plea or answer already entered. Murray v. Marshall, 106 Ga. 522, 32 S.E. 634 (1899).

Appeal carries up whole record and judgment binds both appealing and nonappealing parties. Murray v. Marshall, 106 Ga. 522, 32 S.E. 634 (1899); Bryson v. Scott, 111 Ga. 196, 36 S.E. 619 (1900).

Two parties may file appeal jointly.

- When either party, without other joining, can appeal, and all be bound by final judgment, appeal will not be null and void simply because two of the parties filed appeal jointly. Marks v. Steinberg, 55 Ga. App. 561, 190 S.E. 808 (1937).

Section applies to appeals from decrees. Smith v. Cooper, 21 Ga. 359 (1857) (see now O.C.G.A. § 5-3-5).

Entry of appeal prevents issuance of execution against other party. Lewis v. Armstrong, 69 Ga. 752 (1882).

Appeal by maker of note from joint judgment of county against the maker and indorsers prevents execution against indorsers. Turnell v. Carter, 5 Ga. App. 847, 64 S.E. 114 (1909).

Right of all parties to prosecute or defend.

- All parties who are brought up on appeal, whether the parties have filed an appeal or not have the right to appear and prosecute or defend, whichever the case may be. Hunt v. Henderson, 178 Ga. App. 688, 344 S.E.2d 470 (1986).

Decedent's non-party mother lacked standing to appeal.

- Notwithstanding a settlement agreement in which the decedent's wife released any interest in the decedent's estate, given that the decedent's mother was not a party in the probate court, despite publication of notice and service by the wife, the mother lacked standing to appeal the probate court's decision to award the wife a year's support. Booker v. Booker, 286 Ga. App. 6, 648 S.E.2d 445 (2007).

Cited in Powell v. Perry, 63 Ga. 447 (1879); Lewis & Co. v. Chisolm, 68 Ga. 40 (1881); Wheeler v. Layman Foundation, 188 Ga. 267, 3 S.E.2d 645 (1939); Hardwick v. Georgia Power Co., 100 Ga. App. 38, 110 S.E.2d 24 (1959); Colley v. Dillon, 158 Ga. App. 416, 280 S.E.2d 425 (1981).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review, § 231 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 325 et seq.

ALR.

- May new trial or reversal for error as to measure of damages against one or more of the parties be restricted to those parties, 32 A.L.R. 255.

Power of legislature to require appellate court to review evidence, 33 A.L.R. 10.

Judgment or order dismissing action as against one defendant as subject of appeal or error before disposition of case as against codefendant, 114 A.L.R. 759.

Grant of new trial, or reversal of judgment on appeal as to one joint tortfeasor, as requiring new trial or reversal as to other tortfeasor, 143 A.L.R. 7.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 5-3-5 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 3

In THE MATTER OF TIMOTHY ORMAN MCCALEP (Two Cases)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-02-06

Snippet: 4, 1.5, 1.15 (I) and (II), 1.16, 3.2, 3.5 (d), 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 8.4 (a) (1) and (4), and 9.3 of the Georgia

In re Steckbauer

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-10-21

Citation: 293 Ga. 893, 750 S.E.2d 363, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3194, 2013 WL 5708615, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 877

Snippet: evidence and found that Steckbauer violated Rules 5.3, 5.5, 8.4 (a) (1) and 8.4 (a) (4). It also found probable

In Re Whatley

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-11-07

Citation: 621 S.E.2d 732, 279 Ga. 867, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3350, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 759

Snippet: that John Clark Whatley VI violated Rules 1.15, 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct