O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-27-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Statute text

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Georgia Lottery for Education Act."

History

(Code 1981, § 50-27-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 3173, § 2.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, "State Government: Lottery for Education," see 30 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 257 (2013).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1997–2019 · leading case: Kyle v. Georgia Lottery Corp., 718 S.E.2d 801 (Ga. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kyle v. Georgia Lottery Corp., 718 S.E.2d 801 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 4× “GLC was created by the General Assembly in 1992 under the authority of the Georgia Lottery for Education Act, OCGA § 50-27-1 et seq., for the purpose of marketing and selling lottery tickets to benefit state educational purposes.”
Jackson v. Georgia Lottery Corp., 491 S.E.2d 408 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “3173, § 2; OCGA § 50-27-1 et seq. The Act created the GLC and delineated its powers.”
Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Daniel (In Re Daniel), 225 B.R. 249 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1998). · cites it 2× “The contract was executed under O.C.G.A. § 50-27-1, et seq., the Georgia Lottery for Education Act.”
Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. (In Re Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc.), 266 B.R. 544 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 50-27-1 (1982 & Supp.2000) et seq.”
Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Sumner, 529 S.E.2d 925 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “The legislature further declared that “lottery games shall be operated and managed in a manner which provides continuing entertainment to the public, *761 maximizes revenues, and ensures that the lottery is operated with integrity and dignity.”
Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Thompson (In Re Thompson), 296 B.R. 563 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2003). · cites it 2× “See O.C.G.A. § 50-27-1 (2002). Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Retailer Contract dated October 6, 2000.”
Amusement Leasing, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “The GLC was created by the General Assembly in 1992 under the authority of the Georgia Lottery for Education Act (the “Education Act”), OCGA § 50-27-1 et seq.,3 and OCGA § 50-27-4 of the Education Act provides in relevant part: “There is created a body corporate and politic to…”
Georgia Lottery Corp. v. Sonalben Patel (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “And although not cited by either party, we find it significant that the UDTPA expressly does not apply to “[c]onduct in compliance with the orders or rules of a statute administered by a federal, state, or local governmental agency.” OCGA § 10- 1-374 (a) (1).”
Scope of Exemption Under Fed. Lottery Statutes for Lotteries Conducted by a State Acting Under the Auth. of State Law (OLC 2008). “2008); Ga. Code Ann. §§ 50-27-1 to 50-27-55 (2006); Idaho Code §§ 67-7401 to 67-7452 (2006 & Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.