O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 (2019)

Furnishing alcoholic beverages to minor children; gambling with minor children

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The custodial parent or parents shall have a right of action against any person who shall sell or furnish alcoholic beverages to that parent’s underage child for the child’s use without the permission of the child’s parent. (b) A parent shall have a right of action against any person who shall play and bet at any game of chance with his minor child for money or any other thing of value without the parent’s permission.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, §§ 2952, 2953; Code 1868, §§ 2959, 2960; Code 1873, §§ 3010, 3011; Code 1882, §§ 3010, 3011; Civil Code 1895, §§ 3871, 3872; Civil Code 1910, §§ 4467, 4468; Code 1933, §§ 105-1205, 105-1206; Ga. L. 1988, p. 365, § 1.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Constitutional provisions on alcohol, U.S. Const., amend 21. Prohibition of sale of alcoholic beverages by or to underage persons generally, § 3-3-23 et seq. Sale of alcoholic beverages to minors generally, § 3-3-24. Gambling and related offenses, § 16-12-20 et seq. Editor’s notes. - Section 2 of Ga. L. 1988, p. 365, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that nothing in that Act shall be construed to create any new or additional cause of action.

Law reviews. - For annual survey of tort law, see 58 Mercer L. Rev. 385 (2006). For note discussing organized crime in Georgia with respect to the application of state gambling laws, and suggesting proposals for combatting organized crime, see 7 Ga. St. B. J. 124 (1970). For note discussing tavern keeper liability in Georgia for injury caused by a person to whom an intoxicant was sold, see 9 Ga. L. Rev. 239 (1974).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Constitutionality of subsection (a) prior to 1988 amendment. - Subsec-

tion (a) of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 as it existed prior to the 1988 amendment created a

gender classification which did not rest upon ‘‘some ground of difference having a fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation,’’ and therefore violated equal protection of the laws. Stepperson, Inc. v. Long, 256 Ga. 838, 353 S.E.2d 461 (1987). Strict liability for injury resulting from liquor sales is constitutional on the basis that the state enjoys a particularly broad police power as a result of the U.S. Const., amend. 21, repealing prohibition. Reeves v. Bridges, 248 Ga. 600, 284 S.E.2d 416 (1981). Legislature did not intend to impose strict liability in enacting O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18. Reeves v. Bridges, 248 Ga. 600, 284 S.E.2d 416 (1981). Cause of action. - Parent is provided a right of action against any party who furnishes spiritous liquors to one’s child without the parent’s permission. Dodd v. Slater, 101 Ga. App. 362, 114 S.E.2d 170 (1960). Cause of action under subsection (a) vested in parent. - Subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 was amended to place the cause of action in ‘‘a parent’’ when the legislature enacted the Code of 1981, effective November 1, 1982, and the failure to amend subsection (a) in a similar manner was a mere oversight. Thus, although subsection (a) as it existed until the 1988 amendment was unconstitutional as written, the entire statute should not fall on account of the defect in a relatively unimportant part, and the action against one who furnished alcoholic beverages to an underage child for the child’s use without the permission of the child’s parent was vested in a parent, to be brought by either of them or jointly by both of them. Stepperson, Inc. v. Long, 256 Ga. 838, 353 S.E.2d 461 (1987). Parent’s participation in sting operation. - When parents willingly participated in a sting operation in which the parents anticipated that a provider would attempt to serve alcohol to the parents’ underage children, the parents could not recover damages against the provider under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18(a). Allowing the parents to recover in such a circumstance would be unreasonable and would not serve the purpose of the statute, which

was to prevent the furnishing of alcoholic beverages to underage children in the absence of parental consent. Abreu v. Rainey, 293 Ga. App. 597, 667 S.E.2d 434 (2008). Serving alcohol to teenager over age of majority. - Trial court erroneously denied a motion to dismiss a personal injury action filed by two parents against two social hosts, arising out of the death of the parents’ 20-year-old daughter, which alleged that the social hosts served the daughter alcohol, and the daughter died when the daughter drunkenly drove into a tree after leaving the social hosts’ home, as the action was barred due to the fact that the daughter had already reached the age of majority at the time of the accident. Penny v. McBride, 282 Ga. App. 590, 639 S.E.2d 561 (2006), cert. denied, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 223 (Ga. 2007). Consent of the minor to drink alcohol was of no consequence since the cause of action lay with the minor’s parents. McNamee v. A.J.W., 238 Ga. App. 534, 519 S.E.2d 298 (1999). O.C.G.A. § 51-1-40, which precludes recovery by a consumer against provider, did not apply in an action by parents for damages under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18. Eldridge v. Aronson, 221 Ga. App. 662, 472 S.E.2d 497 (1996). ‘‘Custodial parent’’ construed. - Parent with custody of a minor pursuant to a court order is the ‘‘custodial parent.’’ Leach v. Braswell, 804 F. Supp. 1551 (S.D. Ga. 1992), aff ’d, 8 F.3d 37 (11th Cir. 1993). Summary judgment for lessor of store which sold beer to minor. - Defendant oil company was entitled to summary judgment, since, although beer was sold to the plaintiff ’s minor son at a filling station/convenience store leased by the defendant, defendant had no control over the time, manner, and method of operating the store. Leach v. Brilad Oil Co., 753 F. Supp. 366 (S.D. Ga. 1991). Summary judgment improperly granted to property owner and party guests. - Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to a property owner and the party guests, as to a mother’s claims that they provided alcohol to a minor, who later was killed in an auto

accident, in violation of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18(a), as there was a triable issue of fact where the evidence indicated that the owner allowed the guests to bring kegs of beer to the party, at which most of the other guests were minors, and that the guests knowingly allowed the deceased minor to drink beer from the kegs; the mother was not precluded from recovering damages under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-6, as there was a triable issue of fact as to whether these acts were intentional. Mowell v. Marks, 277 Ga. App. 524, 627 S.E.2d 141 (2006). Fact that the defendant did not personally attend the party at which alcoholic beverages were provided to the plaintiffs’ underage son did not settle the question of whether the defendant ‘‘furnished’’ beverages within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18. Eldridge v. Aronson, 221 Ga. App. 662, 472 S.E.2d 497 (1996). Damages recoverable. - In a suit brought upon a right of action under this section, the plaintiff may recover both general and special damages. Wright v. Smith, 128 Ga. 432, 57 S.E. 684 (1907). Damages recoverable under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 by a parent may be limited to general and special damages suffered directly by the parent, as opposed to damages the parent may have to pay to a third person. Sutter v. Hutchings, 254 Ga. 194, 327 S.E.2d 716 (1985). Damages under subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 are limited to vindictive damages authorized by O.C.G.A. § 51-12-6 because the legislature has declared, in O.C.G.A. § 51-1-40 (a), that the consumption of alcohol, rather than the furnishing of alcohol, is the proximate cause of any self-inflicted injury to an intoxicated minor. Leach v. Braswell, 804 F. Supp. 1551 (S.D. Ga. 1992), aff ’d, 8 F.3d 37 (11th Cir. 1993).

Liability for injuries to consumer of alcohol. - Provider of alcohol cannot be held liable to a consumer of alcohol for injuries sustained as a result of such consumption. Steedley v. Huntley’s Jiffy Stores, Inc., 209 Ga. App. 23, 432 S.E.2d 625 (1993). Legal and medical expenses. - Parent of 19 year old son who lived with the parent had no right of action under subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 to recover the legal, medical, and other expenses which the parent incurred on the son’s behalf. Burch v. Uokuni Int’l, Inc., 192 Ga. App. 861, 386 S.E.2d 889 (1989). Discovery of defendant’s worldly circumstances. - In an action under subsection (a) O.C.G.A. § 51-1-18 by a parent for furnishing alcoholic beverages to the parent’s underage child without the parent’s consent, when the parent has prayed for general, special, O.C.G.A. § 51-12-5, and O.C.G.A. § 51-12-6 damages, and the parent has not yet made an election to forego all other damages in favor of § 51-12-6 damages, the trial court is correct in denying the parent’s motion to compel discovery of defendant’s worldly circumstances. If, however, the parent timely amends the parent’s complaint to abandon all claims except one for § 51-12-6 damages, the parent will be entitled to discover the defendant’s worldly circumstances. Stepperson, Inc. v. Long, 256 Ga. 838, 353 S.E.2d 461 (1987). Cited in Edwards v. Monroe, 54 Ga. App. 791, 189 S.E. 419 (1936); Hosford v. Hosford, 58 Ga. App. 188, 198 S.E. 289 (1938); Dodd v. Slater, 101 Ga. App. 358, 114 S.E.2d 167 (1960); Keaton v. Kroger Co., 143 Ga. App. 23, 237 S.E.2d 443 (1977); Riverside Enters., Inc. v. Rahn, 171 Ga. App. 674, 320 S.E.2d 595 (1984); Spivey v. Sellers, 185 Ga. App. 241, 363 S.E.2d 856 (1987); Hansen v. Etheridge, 232 Ga. App. 408, 501 S.E.2d 517 (1998).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 220 et seq. C.J.S. - 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 488 et seq., 840, 841. ALR. - Liability, under dramshop acts,

of one who sells or furnishes liquor otherwise than in operation of regularly established liquor business, 8 ALR3d 1412. Criminal offense of selling liquor to a minor or permitting him to stay on li-

censed premises as affected by ignorance or mistake regarding his age, 12 ALR3d 991. Contributory negligence allegedly contributing to cause of injury as defense in Civil Damage Act proceeding, 64 ALR3d 849. Proof of causation of intoxication as a prerequisite to recovery under Civil Damage Act, 64 ALR3d 882. Civil Damage Act: liability of one who furnishes liquor to another for consumption by third parties, for injury caused by consumer, 64 ALR3d 922. Liability of state or municipality in tort action for damages arising out of sale of intoxicating liquor by state or municipally operated liquor store or establishment, 95 ALR3d 1243.

Common-law right of action for damage sustained by plaintiff in consequence of sale or gift of intoxicating liquor or habit-forming drug to another, 97 ALR3d 528; 62 ALR4th 16. Intoxicating liquors: employer’s liability for furnishing or permitting liquor on social occasion, 51 ALR4th 1048. Social host’s liability for injuries incurred by third parties as a result of intoxicated guest’s negligence, 62 ALR4th 16. Liability of independent accountant to investors or shareholders, 48 ALR5th 389. Social host’s liability for death or injuries incurred by person to whom alcohol was served, 54 ALR5th 313.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Penny v. McBride, 639 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Penny v. McBride, 639 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 24× “Jane and Michael Penny appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to dismiss the personal injury action brought by Gary and Jill McBride under OCGA § 51-1-18 (a) for damages caused by the Pennys’ service of alcohol to the McBrides’ 20-year-old daughter, who died when she…”
Stepperson, Inc. v. Long, 353 S.E.2d 461 (Ga. 1987). · cites it 30× “This case presents a constitutional challenge to OCGA § 51-1-18 (a). The facts essential to this appeal are not in dispute.”
Eldridge v. Aronson, 472 S.E.2d 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 10× “Bill and Jane Eldridge, the custodial parents of David Eldridge, sought damages under OCGA § 51-1-18 (a) against Mark and Patricia Aronson for allegedly furnishing alcoholic beverages to their underage son without their permission.”
Mowell v. Marks, 603 S.E.2d 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 6× “They did not bring suit under OCGA § 51-1-40, but instead based their claim on OCGA § 51-1-18 (a), which gives a parent “a right of action against any person who .”
Hansen v. Etheridge, 501 S.E.2d 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 8× “Bonowitz and Eric Hansen pursued Patton into the parking lot, at which time Bonowitz and Patton got into a fight that led to the stabbing of Eric Hansen when he tried to break it up. Having asked Patton to leave and having watched him leave her leased premises, what else was…”
Sutter v. Turner, 325 S.E.2d 384 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 14× “Sutter is recoverable by Pruett from the Hutchings under OCGA § 51-1-18 (a). The Hutchings’ motion for summary judgment in the action for damages brought by Mrs.”
Leach v. Braswell, 804 F. Supp. 1551 (S.D. Ga. 1992). · cites it 24× “Section 51-1-18 is inspecific as to whether the “custodial parent” is the parent who has physical custody of the minor, or the parent who has custody of the minor pursuant to a court order.”
Sutter v. Hutchings, 327 S.E.2d 716 (Ga. 1985). · cites it 2× “The stepfather cannot recover under OCGA § 51-1-18 (a) for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals in the third division of its opinion, which we affirm.”
Burch v. Uokuni Int'l, Inc., 386 S.E.2d 889 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 8× “The appellant brought the present action seeking, to recover damages from the appellees pursuant to OCGA § 51-1-18 (a), based on their alleged unlawful conduct in furnishing alcoholic beverages to his “underage” son.”
McNamee v. A. J. W., 519 S.E.2d 298 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 8× “OCGA § 51-1-18 (a) provides: "The custodial parent or parents shall have a right of action against any person who shall sell or furnish alcoholic beverages to that parent’s underage child for the child’s use without the permission of the child’s parent.”
Riverside Enter., Inc. v. Rahn, 320 S.E.2d 595 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “” Compare OCGA § 51-1-18 (a). Rahn cites dicta contained in Keaton, supra, p.”
Spivey v. Sellers, 363 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Appellee alleged that appellant enticed and induced her to consume alcohol, “got her drunk,” and then induced and allowed her to drive his father’s automobile which appellee crashed, she alone sustaining certain injuries.”
— 51-1-18(a) — 4 cases
Hansen v. Etheridge, 501 S.E.2d 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). “Bonowitz and Eric Hansen pursued Patton into the parking lot, at which time Bonowitz and Patton got into a fight that led to the stabbing of Eric Hansen when he tried to break it up. Having asked Patton to leave and having watched him leave her leased premises, what else was…”
Leach v. Braswell, 804 F. Supp. 1551 (S.D. Ga. 1992). “Section 51-1-18 is inspecific as to whether the “custodial parent” is the parent who has physical custody of the minor, or the parent who has custody of the minor pursuant to a court order.”
McNamee v. AJW, 519 S.E.2d 298 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Leach v. Brilad Oil Co., 753 F. Supp. 366 (S.D. Ga. 1991).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.