O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 51-9-6 (2019)

Damages for continuing trespass

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Damages for a continuing trespass are limited to those which have occurred before an action is commenced. Subsequent damages flowing from a continuation of the trespass give a new cause of action. (Civil Code 1895, § 3884; Civil Code 1910, § 4480; Code 1933, § 105-1406.)

History of Code section. - The language of this Code section is derived in part from the decision in Savannah & Ogeechee Canal Co. v. Bourguin, 51 Ga. 378 (1874).

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Keep Out! The Efficacy of Trespass, Nuisance and Privacy Torts as Applied to Drones,’’ see 33 Georgia St. U.L. Rev. 359 (2017).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Section not applicable in ejectment action. - O.C.G.A. § 51-9-6 did not apply to limit damages in an ejectment action by a landowner against an outdoor sign company. Outdoor Sys. v. Woodson, 221 Ga. App. 901, 473 S.E.2d 204 (1996). Intent of this section is that in suit for continuing trespass the plaintiff cannot recover damages arising after suit is filed, except as a ‘‘new cause of action,’’ to be declared upon in a new and different suit. Savannah Elec. & Power Co. v. Horton, 44 Ga. App. 578, 162 S.E. 299 (1932). Plaintiff ’s election. - The plaintiff, at the plaintiff ’s election, may sue for any damages which have resulted from a continuous trespass within the statute of limitations, before the entire injury is done. Other damages might be made the basis of a new action. Becker v. Donalson, 133 Ga. 864, 67 S.E. 92 (1910). When all damages claimed resulted from continuing trespass committed, declaration was not subject to special demurrers (now motions to dismiss). Gloss v. Jacobs, 86 Ga. App. 161, 71 S.E.2d 253 (1952).

Damages sustained by reason of nuisance which may be abated, or continuing but not permanent trespass, are recoverable up to time of bringing suit, the reason being that the trespass or nuisance may or may not be continued after the suit is commenced, and if continued, a new cause of action arises therefor. Lankford v. Dockery, 85 Ga. App. 86, 67 S.E.2d 800 (1951). Damages from continuing trespass may be setoff in an equitable action for specific performance, cancellation of deeds, and damage to the land in question. Becker v. Donalson, 133 Ga. 864, 67 S.E. 92 (1910). Permanent injury to freehold. - This section does not apply to a suit for permanent injury to the freehold. Central of Ga. Ry. v. Kelly, 7 Ga. App. 464, 67 S.E. 118 (1910). Cited in Williams v. Aycock, 52 Ga. App. 386, 183 S.E. 628 (1936); Groover v. Hightower, 59 Ga. App. 491, 1 S.E.2d 446 (1939); Calhoun v. Edwards, 202 Ga. 95, 42 S.E.2d 426 (1947).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 75 Am. Jur. 2d, Trespass, §§ 19, 88 et seq. C.J.S. - 87 C.J.S., Trespass, § 139. ALR. - Measure of damages for interference with percolating waters, 35 ALR 1222; 55 ALR 1385; 109 ALR 395. Measure of damages for injury to or destruction of growing crop, 175 ALR 159. Right of trespasser to credit for expenditures in producing, as against his liabil-

ity for value of, oil or minerals, 21 ALR2d 380. Measure and elements of damages for pollution of a stream, 49 ALR2d 253. Easements: way by necessity where property is accessible by navigable water, 9 ALR3d 600. Recovery in trespass for injury to land caused by airborne pollutants, 2 ALR4th 1054.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1996 · leading case: Girone v. City of Winder, 452 S.E.2d 794 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).
Girone v. City of Winder, 452 S.E.2d 794 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “NOTES [1] See OCGA § 51-9-6; Rossee Oil Co. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, 212 Ga.”
Outdoor Sys., Inc. v. Woodson, 473 S.E.2d 204 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “This enumeration, apparently based on an interpretation of OCGA § 51-9-6, has no merit. That statute, which does not apply here, limits claims for damages in cases of continuous trespass to those incurred before suit is filed because subsequent damages give rise to a new cause…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.