Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1904, p. 79, § 8; Civil Code 1910, § 3456; Ga. L. 1920, p. 215, § 10; Code 1933, §§ 25-211, 25-310; Ga. L. 1955, p. 431, § 11; Ga. L. 1963, p. 370, § 3; Ga. L. 1975, p. 393, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 14, § 7.)
- Trial court properly dismissed a declaratory judgment action brought by a bank and a cash advance lender, which was operating as an agent for the bank, to stop the Georgia Industrial Loan Commissioner from conducting an investigation of their lending activities, because the Commissioner was authorized to conduct an investigation of the two entities' loan activities, in spite of the lender's claim that the bank and the lender were operating under the authority of federal banking law. BankWest, Inc. v. Oxendine, 266 Ga. App. 771, 598 S.E.2d 343 (2004).
- Former Code 1933, § 25-310 (see now O.C.G.A. § 7-3-22) empowered the Commissioner to investigate loans and business of anyone violating provisions of the Industrial Loan Act (see now O.C.G.A. § 7-3-1 et seq.). 1948-49 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 15.
- It was the intention of the legislature to place exercise of this authority within the discretion of the Commissioner; it was clearly not mandatory upon the Commissioner to make such investigation since former Code 1933, § 25-310 stated that the Commissioner "may . . . investigate." 1948-49 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 15.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-07-13
Citation: 502 S.E.2d 235, 269 Ga. 620, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 2389, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 744
Snippet: E.2d 488 (1993). [21] Milich, supra note 9, § 7.3. [22] 130 Ga.App. 428, 203 S.E.2d 619 (1973). [23]
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1985-06-19
Citation: 331 S.E.2d 520, 254 Ga. 608, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 752
Snippet: ruled on Code §§ 103-103, 203 (now OCGA §§ 10-7-3, -22) in Div. 2, holding that they do not apply to