Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 226-51 (2026)

  Purpose

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART II.  PLANNING COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

 

Note

 

  Part heading reenacted.  L 1991, c 76, part of §1.

 

     §226-51  Purpose.  The purpose of this part is to establish a statewide planning system to coordinate and guide all major state and county activities and to implement the overall theme, goals, objectives, policies, and priority guidelines. [L 1978, c 100, pt of §2; am L 1984, c 236, §3; ree L 1991, c 76, pt of §1]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2008 · leading case: Pono v. Molokai Ranch, Ltd., 194 P.3d 1126 (Haw. App. 2008).
Pono v. Molokai Ranch, Ltd., 194 P.3d 1126 (Haw. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Under HRS §§ 226-51 and -52, conformance with county development plans, including the [MCP], is required to implement the integrated statewide planning system.”
Windward Marine Resort, Inc. v. Sullivan, 948 P.2d 592 (Haw. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “HRS §§ 226-51 and -52(a)(4). Among other things, county general plans "shall indicate desired population and physical development patterns for each county and regions within each county[.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.