Hawaii Revised Statutes
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 226-51 (2026)
Purpose
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
PART II. PLANNING COORDINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Note
Part heading reenacted. L 1991, c 76, part of §1.
§226-51 Purpose. The purpose of this part is to establish a statewide planning system to coordinate and guide all major state and county activities and to implement the overall theme, goals, objectives, policies, and priority guidelines. [L 1978, c 100, pt of §2; am L 1984, c 236, §3; ree L 1991, c 76, pt of §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1997–2008 · leading case: Pono v. Molokai Ranch, Ltd., 194 P.3d 1126 (Haw. App. 2008).
Pono v. Molokai Ranch, Ltd., 194 P.3d 1126 (Haw. App. 2008). “Under HRS §§ 226-51 and -52, conformance with county development plans, including the [MCP], is required to implement the integrated statewide planning system.”
Windward Marine Resort, Inc. v. Sullivan, 948 P.2d 592 (Haw. App. 1997). “HRS §§ 226-51 and -52(a)(4). Among other things, county general plans "shall indicate desired population and physical development patterns for each county and regions within each county[.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.