Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 232-18 (2026)

 

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §232-18  Certificate of appeal to tax appeal court.  (a)  Upon the perfecting of an appeal to the tax appeal court, the tax assessor shall immediately send up to the tax appeal court a certificate in which there shall be set forth the information required by section 232-16 to be set forth in the notice of appeal where an appeal is taken direct from the assessment to the tax appeal court.

     (b)  The certificate shall be accompanied by the taxpayer's return, if any has been filed; provided that the department of taxation may redact all but the last four digits of an individual taxpayer's social security number from an accompanying tax return, a copy of the notice of appeal to the state taxation board of review, or an equivalent administrative body established by county ordinance, and any amendments thereto, and the decision or action, if any, of the state taxation board of review or equivalent administrative body.  Failure of the assessor to comply with this section shall not prejudice or affect the taxpayer's, county's, or assessor's appeal, and the certificate of appeal may be amended at any time up to the final determination of the appeal. [L 1932 2d, c 40, §45; RL 1935, §1941; am L 1939, c 208, §8; RL 1945, §5213; RL 1955, §116-15; am L 1963, c 92, §11; am L 1967, c 37, §1; HRS §232-18; am L 1989, c 14, §11; am L 2009, c 166, §20; am L 2021, c 118, §11]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Narmore v. Kawafuchi, 143 P.3d 1271 (Haw. 2006).
Narmore v. Kawafuchi, 143 P.3d 1271 (Haw. 2006). · cites it 8× “[28] One seeming purpose of filing a copy with the assessor pursuant to HRS § 232-17 is to aid the Department in fulfilling the informational requirements of HRS § 232-18. However, HRS § 232-18 specifically provides that "[f]ailure of the assessor to comply herewith shall not…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.