Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 25
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 25-4 (2026)

  Penalty for violation and false evidence

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §25-4  Penalty for violation and false evidence.  Any person who, having been summoned under section 25-3 to give testimony or to produce any books, records, files, papers, maps and documents, wilfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any questions or wilfully gives false evidence shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than twelve months, or both. [L 1969, c 79, §4]

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: Citizens for the Prot. of the North Kohala Coastline Ex Rel. Withington v. Cnty. of Hawai'i, 979 P.2d 1120 (Haw. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Citizens for the Prot. of the North Kohala Coastline Ex Rel. Withington v. Cnty. of Hawai'i, 979 P.2d 1120 (Haw. 1999). · cites it 2× “) In the present case, the Hawai'i County Planning Director, Virginia Goldstein, determined that under the HPC, Chalón fully complied with HCC chapter 25: the applicant [Chalón] has submitted the information necessary to complete our review of the applications and have…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 25-4(b)(20) — 1 case
Citizens for the Prot. of the North Kohala Coastline Ex Rel. Withington v. Cnty. of Hawai'i, 979 P.2d 1120 (Haw. 1999). “) In the present case, the Hawai'i County Planning Director, Virginia Goldstein, determined that under the HPC, Chalón fully complied with HCC chapter 25: the applicant [Chalón] has submitted the information necessary to complete our review of the applications and have…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 25-4(b)(21) — 1 case
Citizens for the Prot. of the North Kohala Coastline Ex Rel. Withington v. Cnty. of Hawai'i, 979 P.2d 1120 (Haw. 1999). “) In the present case, the Hawai'i County Planning Director, Virginia Goldstein, determined that under the HPC, Chalón fully complied with HCC chapter 25: the applicant [Chalón] has submitted the information necessary to complete our review of the applications and have…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.