Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 286-251 (2026)

to 286-266  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART XIV.  ADMINISTRATIVE REVOCATION OF DRIVER'S LICENSE

AND MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION--REPEALED

 

     §§286-251 to 286-266  REPEALED.  L 2000, c 189, §29.

 

Cross References

 

  For present provisions, see chapter 291E.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: Gray v. Admin. Dir. of Court, 931 P.2d 580 (Haw. 1997).
Gray v. Admin. Dir. of Court, 931 P.2d 580 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 9× “” HRS § 286-251 (Supp.1996). The downward revision of the relevant alcohol concentration is not applicable to the present appeal.”
Castro v. Admin. Dir. of the Courts, 40 P.3d 865 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 12× “Contrary to the arresting officer's testimony and Respondent's belief, an alcohol enforcement contact as defined in HRS § 286-251 (Supp.1999) would not include an arrest.”
State v. Garcia, 29 P.3d 919 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 4× “Effective January 1, 2002, Part XIV of HRS chapter 286, comprising of HRS §§ 286-251 to -266, will be repealed.”
Farmer v. Admin. Dir. of the Court, 11 P.3d 457 (Haw. 2000). · cites it 5× “The Arrestee’s prior driving record in the State of Hawai'i shows three prior alcohol enforcement contacts, as defined by HRS § 286-251 [ (1993 & Supp.”
State v. Toyomura, 904 P.2d 893 (Haw. 1995). · cites it 2× “” The word “referred” is neither defined in HRS § 286-251 (1993), which is the “definitions” section of the Administrative Revocation Program, nor anywhere else in the statutory scheme.”
Soderlund v. Admin. Dir. of the Courts, 26 P.3d 1214 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 3× “The Director concludes that Arres-tee had a breath or blood alcohol concentration, as defined in HRS § 286-251, of .08 or more. [[Image here]] 6.”
State v. Nakata, 878 P.2d 699 (Haw. 1994). · cites it 2× “HRS § 286-251 (Supp.1992). 8 .Section 5 of Act 128 provides that it takes effect upon approval, "providing that [the reduced penalties] shall be retroactive for all pending first-offense cases for [DUI].”
Miller v. Tanaka, 910 P.2d 129 (Haw. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “[3] HRS § 286-251 (1993) defines "Director" as "the administrative director of the courts or any other person within the judiciary appointed by the director to conduct administrative reviews or hearings[,]" and in this case a hearing officer was appointed to conduct the hearing.”
Spock v. Admin. Dir. of the Courts, 29 P.3d 380 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 3× “HRS § 286-251 (Supp.1999) defines "alcohol enforcement contact" as follows: "Alcohol enforcement contact” means any administrative revocation ordered pursuant to this part; any driver's license suspension or revocation imposed by this or any other state or federal jurisdiction…”
In the Interest of Doe, 30 P.3d 231 (Haw. 2001). · cites it 4× “) [6] Effective January 1, 2002, HRS §§ 286-151 to -163 and HRS §§ 286-251 to -266 will be repealed and replaced by a new HRS chapter, that will be entitled "Use of Intoxicants while Operating a Vehicle.”
Biscoe v. Tanaka, 878 P.2d 719 (Haw. 1994). · cites it 2× “HRS § 286-251 defines “director” as “the administrative director of the courts or any other person within the judiciary appointed by the director to carry out other functions relating to administrative revocation under this part." 3 . The record does not contain any direct…”
Santos v. Admin. Dir. of the Court, 18 P.3d 948 (Haw. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “HRS § 286-251 (Supp.1999) defines “[a]l-cohol enforcement contact” as follows: “Alcohol enforcement contact” means any administrative revocation ordered pursuant to this part; any driver’s license suspension or revocation imposed by this or any other state or federal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.