§3-1 Commission. There shall be established
a commission to promote uniform legislation, placed within the department of
the attorney general for administrative purposes, to promote uniformity of
legislation in the United States, to be composed of five commissioners, who
shall be appointed by the governor in the manner prescribed in section 26-34.
The commissioners shall serve without pay but shall be entitled to such technical,
clerical, and stenographic assistance, to be furnished by the department of the
attorney general, as may be necessary or proper to carry out their duties. [L
1911, c 22, §§1, 3; RL 1945, §35; am L 1949, c 326, §1; RL 1955, §1-45; am L Sp
1959 2d, c 1, §§5, 13; HRS §3-1; am L 2022, c 14, §2]
Cross References
Commission is part of attorney general department, see §26-7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases, 1987–2013 · leading case:
Dupree v. Hiraga, 219 P.3d 1084 (Haw. 2009).
Dupree v. Hiraga, 219 P.3d 1084 (Haw. 2009).
· cites it 4× “4 and 5, which summarize Maui County Charter §§ 3-1 and 3-3 and state that the council shall be composed of nine members, including one who is a resident of Lana'i, and that to be eligible to run for the seat, the candidate must be a resident for 90 days next preceding the…”
Kepo'o v. Kane, 103 P.3d 939 (Haw. 2005).
· cites it 4× “” They assert that because the court’s ruling was based on a retrospective application of HAR § 11-200-12(13), its action contravened HRS § 3-1 (1993), which states that no law shall have retrospective application unless clearly expressed or obviously intended.”
Dejetley v. Kaho'ohalahala, 226 P.3d 421 (Haw. 2010).
· cites it 4× “” 29 Hence, § 3-1 man *264 dates that one member of the council be a resident of Lana'i.”
Pavsek v. Sandvold, 279 P.3d 55 (Haw. App. 2012).
“The Director’s decision on a declaratory ruling regarding the applicability of the LUO may be appealed to the ZBA.”
Greenpeace USA v. Stone, 748 F. Supp. 749 (D. Haw. 1990).
“" Section 3-1. Furthermore, by its terms, the Order only requires an EIS for "major Federal actions significantly affecting the environment of the global commons outside the jurisdiction of any nation.”
Hoku Lele, LLC v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 296 P.3d 1072 (Haw. App. 2013).
“DPP Rules § 3-1 (1993) provides: “Any interested person may petition the director for a declaratory ruling as to the applicability of any statute or ordinanee[.”
Rice v. Cayetano, 941 F. Supp. 1529 (D. Haw. 1996).
“E, § 3-1. The guidelines define the term “Hawaiian” as “any descendant of the indigenous people inhabiting the Hawaiian Islands which exercised sovereignty and subsisted in the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778.”
Save Diamond Head Waters LLC v. Hans Hedemann Surf, Inc., 198 P.3d 715 (Haw. App. 2008).
· cites it 2× “In addition, pursuant to HRS § 91-8, 12 “interested person[s]” may petition the director of the DPP “as to the applicability of any statute or ordinance relating to the department.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.