Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 334
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-59 (2026)

and 334-59.5  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §§334-59 and 334-59.5  REPEALED.  L 2025, c 219, §§27, 28.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Doe, 78 P.3d 341 (Haw. App. 2003). · cites it 16× “The State thereupon withdrew Petition 3 and the GAL orally moved for an Ex Parte Petition for Emergency Hospitalization of Doe to HSH, pursuant to HRS § 334-59 (Supp.2002). [8] *348 Over the objection of Doe's counsel, Judge Carlsmith orally granted the ex parte motion.”
Steven Hyer v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 118 F.4th 1044 (9th Cir. 2024). “Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-59 . The psychologist approved the MH-1 based on Officer Bolibol’s description of Hyer’s behavior and directed that Hyer be taken into protective custody.”
State v. Valenzona, 992 P.2d 718 (Haw. App. 1999). “If the court finds that the party meets the requirements under section 334-59(a)(2), the court may further order that the party be taken to the nearest facility for emergency examination and treatment.”
Raymond v. Wilcox Mem'l Hosp. (D. Haw. 2019). · cites it 2× “Elliott’s work required ordering psychotropic medications for such patients and ordering Defendant’s nurse employees to administer medications accordingly.”
State v. Clapp, 177 P.3d 361 (Haw. App. 2008). “If the court finds that the party meets the requirements under section 334-59(a)(2), the court further may order that the party be taken to the nearest facility for emergency examination and treatment.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-59(a) — 1 case
Raymond v. Wilcox Mem'l Hosp. (D. Haw. 2019). “Elliott’s work required ordering psychotropic medications for such patients and ordering Defendant’s nurse employees to administer medications accordingly.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 334-59(a)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Valenzona, 992 P.2d 718 (Haw. App. 1999). “If the court finds that the party meets the requirements under section 334-59(a)(2), the court may further order that the party be taken to the nearest facility for emergency examination and treatment.”
State v. Clapp, 177 P.3d 361 (Haw. App. 2008). “If the court finds that the party meets the requirements under section 334-59(a)(2), the court further may order that the party be taken to the nearest facility for emergency examination and treatment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.