Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 576E-15 (2026)

Guidelines to be followed

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §576E-15  Guidelines to be followed.  When an administrative order establishes or modifies the amount of child support required to be paid by a party, the guidelines established under section 576D-7 shall be applied, except when exceptional circumstances warrant departure.  The most current guidelines shall be used to calculate the amount of the child support obligation. [L 1988, c 154, pt of §2; am L 1990, c 176, §21; am L 1991, c 216, §3; am L 1994, c 105, §14]

 

Case Notes

 

  Father’s due process rights not violated by child support enforcement agency when it did not notify father prior to administrative hearing that the issue was to increase father’s child support obligation where, given that father was aware that the purpose of the hearing was the modification of father’s child support obligation and that, absent exceptional circumstances, the hearings officer would be bound by the amount calculated by the child support guidelines worksheet, this information was sufficient notice to father that child support amount may be reduced or increased.  108 H. 202, 118 P.3d 1145 (2005).

  Whether net income earned by an adult-student-son or daughter is "exceptional circumstance", discussed.  86 H. 368 (App.), 949 P.2d 208 (1997).

  Where family court clearly erred in its calculation of both parents' monthly gross incomes, the resulting child support award was clearly erroneous.  134 H. 431 (App.), 341 P.3d 1231 (2014).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Jacoby v. Jacoby, 341 P.3d 1231 (Haw. App. 2014).
Jacoby v. Jacoby, 341 P.3d 1231 (Haw. App. 2014). “Both HRS §§ 576E-15 and 571- *447 52.5 provide that the family courts must use the CSG to calculate support awards “except when exceptional circumstances warrant departure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.