§578-8 Hearing; investigation; decree.
(a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held at
which the petitioner or petitioners, and any legal parent married to a
petitioner, and any subject of the adoption whose consent is required, have
personally appeared before the court, unless expressly excused by the court.
After considering the petition and any evidence as the petitioners and any
other properly interested person may wish to present, the court may enter a
decree of adoption if it is satisfied that:
(1) The individual is adoptable under sections 578-1
and 578-2;
(2) The individual is physically, mentally, and
otherwise suitable for adoption by the petitioners;
(3) The petitioners are fit and proper persons and
financially able to give the individual a proper home and education, if the
individual is a child; and
(4) The adoption will be for the best interests of
the individual,
which decree shall take effect on the date fixed
therein by the court, to be not earlier than the date of the filing of the
petition and not later than six months after the date of the entry of the
decree.
(b) Before entering the decree, the court
shall notify the director of human services of the pendency of such petition
for adoption and allow a reasonable time for the director to make such
investigation as the director may deem proper as to the fitness of the
petitioners to adopt the individual, however, the physical disability of the
petitioners shall not of itself be determinant of unfitness for purposes of
this section, and as to whether the best interest of the individual will be
subserved by the adoption; provided that the court may, if it finds that the
best interests of the individual to be adopted so require, by written order
waive the requirement for notification and investigation above set forth, and
enter its decree solely on the basis of the evidence adduced at the hearing.
The director shall have the right to intervene in any adoption proceeding for
the purpose of protecting the interests of the individual to be adopted or of
any legal parent of the individual, and shall have the same rights of appeal as
any party to the proceeding. The attorney general, upon the request of the
director, shall represent the director in any such proceeding. The director,
when notified as above set forth, or when the director has intervened without
notification, shall make a report to the court within the time required,
reporting the facts disclosed and the director's recommendation; provided that
the director, if the director determines that the best interests of the
individual to be adopted will be served thereby, may refer any such
notification to a child placing organization approved by the department under
section 346-17, and the report and recommendation of such organization, when
forwarded by the director, shall be considered by the court in lieu of a report
and recommendation by the director. If the court determines that any such
report discloses facts adverse to the petitioners or indicates that the best
interests of the individual to be adopted will not be subserved by the proposed
adoption, it shall thereupon give notice of the determination to the
petitioners and afford them a reasonable opportunity to rebut the report.
(c) In cases where a child is adopted from a
foreign country and is brought into the State, the court, in its discretion,
may dispense with a hearing upon receipt of a sworn affidavit, ex-parte, from
the adoptive parents requesting that the hearing be dispensed with, and upon a
finding that the issues it would have reviewed have received full consideration
by the country from which the child was adopted and the United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services. [RL 1945, pt of §12276; am L 1945, c 40,
pt of §1; am L 1953, c 115, pt of §1; RL 1955, §331-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1,
§20; HRS §578-8; am L 1973, c 211, §3(f); am L 1976, c 194, §1(3); am L 1979, c
65, §2; gen ch 1985; am L 1987, c 339, §4; am L 1990, c 34, §35 and c 74, §1;
am L 1995, c 37, §2; am L 2005, c 22, §41; am L 2019, c 111, §42]
Cross References
Prospective adoptive parents; standards and home studies, see
§346-19.7.
Rules of Court
Decrees and orders, see Hawaii Family Court Rules, part
A(VII).
Hearings, see HFCR rule 106; intervention, see HFCR rule 24.
Law Journals and Reviews
International Adoptions and Overlooked Abuse: Hawai`i's Role
in Marshallese Adoptions. 46 UH L. Rev. 209 (2023).
Case Notes
Decree of adoption not subject to collateral attack where
court had jurisdiction of parties and subject matter. 11 H. 450 (1898); 26 H.
439 (1922); 26 H. 515 (1922).
Decree of adoption refused when petitioners not proper
persons to have care and custody of child. 29 H. 238 (1926).
Appeal from decree, who may. 45 H. 69, 361 P.2d 1054 (1961).
Attorney's fees may not ordinarily be awarded in absence of
statute or agreement. 56 H. 543, 544 P.2d 728 (1975).
Responsibility of department of human services discussed,
where family court erred in concluding that adoption agreement, which allowed
termination of foster board payments prior to completion of adoption process,
violated public policy. 74 H. 409, 849 P.2d 55 (1993).
Cited: 26 H. 433 (1922); 26 H. 439 (1922); 32 H. 443, 445
(1932).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
9
cases (
5 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case:
In re H.A., 422 P.3d 642 (Haw. App. 2017).
In re H.A., 422 P.3d 642 (Haw. App. 2017).
· cites it 33× “Accordingly, we turn to the HRS § 578-8 requirements for entering the adoption decrees in this case.”
In re: ASK., 522 P.3d 270 (Haw. 2022).
· cites it 10× “See HRS § 578-8 (2018 & Supp. 2019). So what’s a family court to do when faced with competing petitions for adoption of three young siblings? In petitions for adoption and permanent placement, we hold that a family court is free to consider any admissible evidence that addresses…”
SOOK YOUNG HONG v. Napolitano, 772 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D. Haw. 2011).
· cites it 5× “See Haw.Rev.Stat. § 578-8 (authorizing court to set date of adoption as early as the filing of the petition, and as late as six months after the date of the entry of the decree); CAR at 14 (Taeyoung’s adoption *1281 order, declaring that, “[a]s of the date of this decree, the…”
In re: Adoption of A, 501 P.3d 332 (Haw. App. 2021).
· cites it 40× “Burdick) (FOF 256, COL 7); (5) by denying Grandmother's petition despite its findings and conclusions that Grandmother satisfied the HRS § 578-8 adoption requirements (COLs 13, 14, 15, 24, and 25); (6) by concluding that the DHS reasonably withheld consent to Grandmother's…”
In the Interest of Doe, 849 P.2d 55 (Haw. 1993).
· cites it 8× “However, if a family is found that is willing and able to adopt the child, the DHS asserts that it also has a duty under HRS § 578-8 (Supp. 1991) to ensure that the prospective adoptive family is financially able to care for the *414 child without financial assistance from the…”
In Re the Guardianship of Doe, 4 P.3d 508 (Haw. App. 2000).
“See HRS § 571-46 (Criteria and procedure in awarding custody and visitation); HRS § 578-2 (1993) (Consent to adoption); § 578-8 (Supp.1999) (Hearing; investigation; decree); HRS § 571-61 (1993) (Termination of parental rights; petition).”
In re: AK & SK, 151 Haw. 15 (Haw. App. 2022).
· cites it 10× “2019) provides, in part: § 578-8 Hearing; investigation; decree. (a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held .”
In re: Adoption of B.H. (Haw. App. 2025).
· cites it 8× “2019) requires the court to be satisfied that (1) the individual is adoptable, (2) the individual is suitable for adoption, (3) the petitioners are fit persons and financially able, and (4) the adoption is in the child's best interests. Testimony showed Minor's mother passed…”
In re: LI, 530 P.3d 427 (Haw. App. 2023).
· cites it 4× “HRS § 578-8(a) (Supp. 2019) sets forth requirements for entering an adoption decree which provides, in pertinent part: (a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(a) — 6 cases
In re H.A., 422 P.3d 642 (Haw. App. 2017).
“Accordingly, we turn to the HRS § 578-8 requirements for entering the adoption decrees in this case.”
In re: ASK., 522 P.3d 270 (Haw. 2022).
“See HRS § 578-8 (2018 & Supp. 2019). So what’s a family court to do when faced with competing petitions for adoption of three young siblings? In petitions for adoption and permanent placement, we hold that a family court is free to consider any admissible evidence that addresses…”
In re: Adoption of A, 501 P.3d 332 (Haw. App. 2021).
“Burdick) (FOF 256, COL 7); (5) by denying Grandmother's petition despite its findings and conclusions that Grandmother satisfied the HRS § 578-8 adoption requirements (COLs 13, 14, 15, 24, and 25); (6) by concluding that the DHS reasonably withheld consent to Grandmother's…”
In re: AK & SK, 151 Haw. 15 (Haw. App. 2022).
“2019) provides, in part: § 578-8 Hearing; investigation; decree. (a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held .”
In re: LI, 530 P.3d 427 (Haw. App. 2023).
“HRS § 578-8(a) (Supp. 2019) sets forth requirements for entering an adoption decree which provides, in pertinent part: (a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(a)(1) — 1 case
In re: Adoption of A, 501 P.3d 332 (Haw. App. 2021).
“Burdick) (FOF 256, COL 7); (5) by denying Grandmother's petition despite its findings and conclusions that Grandmother satisfied the HRS § 578-8 adoption requirements (COLs 13, 14, 15, 24, and 25); (6) by concluding that the DHS reasonably withheld consent to Grandmother's…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(a)(3) — 2 cases
In re: Adoption of A, 501 P.3d 332 (Haw. App. 2021).
“Burdick) (FOF 256, COL 7); (5) by denying Grandmother's petition despite its findings and conclusions that Grandmother satisfied the HRS § 578-8 adoption requirements (COLs 13, 14, 15, 24, and 25); (6) by concluding that the DHS reasonably withheld consent to Grandmother's…”
In re: AK & SK, 151 Haw. 15 (Haw. App. 2022).
“2019) provides, in part: § 578-8 Hearing; investigation; decree. (a) No decree of adoption shall be entered unless a hearing has been held .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(a)(4) — 1 case
In re: Adoption of A, 501 P.3d 332 (Haw. App. 2021).
“Burdick) (FOF 256, COL 7); (5) by denying Grandmother's petition despite its findings and conclusions that Grandmother satisfied the HRS § 578-8 adoption requirements (COLs 13, 14, 15, 24, and 25); (6) by concluding that the DHS reasonably withheld consent to Grandmother's…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(b) — 2 cases
In re H.A., 422 P.3d 642 (Haw. App. 2017).
“Accordingly, we turn to the HRS § 578-8 requirements for entering the adoption decrees in this case.”
In re: Adoption of B.H. (Haw. App. 2025).
“2019) requires the court to be satisfied that (1) the individual is adoptable, (2) the individual is suitable for adoption, (3) the petitioners are fit persons and financially able, and (4) the adoption is in the child's best interests. Testimony showed Minor's mother passed…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 578-8(c)(1)(H) — 1 case
In re H.A., 422 P.3d 642 (Haw. App. 2017).
“Accordingly, we turn to the HRS § 578-8 requirements for entering the adoption decrees in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.