Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 88-110 (2026)

  Board; trustees of funds

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §88-110  Board; trustees of funds.  The board of trustees shall be trustees of the several funds of the system and may invest and reinvest such funds as authorized by this part and by law from time to time provided.  Subject to the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions of this part and by law from time to time provided, the trustees may hold, purchase, sell, assign, transfer or dispose of any of the securities and investments in which any of the funds created herein shall have been invested, as well as of the proceeds of the investments and any moneys belonging to the funds. [L 1925, c 55, pt of §7; RL 1935, pt of §7926; am L 1939, c 5, pt of §1; RL 1945, §710, subs 1; RL 1955, §6-74; HRS §88-100; am L 1969, c 110, pt of §1]

 

Attorney General Opinions

 

  Trustees may not waive penalty for prepayment of loan.  Att. Gen. Op. 62-22.

 

Case Notes

 

  Mentioned:  74 H. 181, 840 P.2d 367.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1992–2007 · leading case: Honda Ex Rel. Kamakana v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys., 120 P.3d 237 (Haw. 2005).
Honda Ex Rel. Kamakana v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys., 120 P.3d 237 (Haw. 2005). · cites it 8× “The ERS Board contends that the "only trust duties expressly imposed by Chapter 88 *243 are those of a prudent financial manager[,]" noting that the "two statutes that expressly reference `trust' duties are HRS §§ 88-110 and 88-127 (1993)." The ERS Board directs this court's…”
Kaho'ohanohano v. State, 162 P.3d 696 (Haw. 2007). · cites it 2× “” HRS § 88-110 (1993); see Honda II, 108 Hawai'i at 344 , 120 P.”
Sifagaloa v. Bd. of Trs. of the Employees' Ret. Sys., 840 P.2d 367 (Haw. 1992). · cites it 4× “2 Sifagaloa urges that his due process rights were violated because the Board of Trustees of the ERS (Trustees) were not unbiased adjudicators, based on their allegedly conflicting duty, as trustees, to preserve the ERS funds pursuant to HRS § 88-110 (1985). 3 We conclude that…”
Kahoohanohano v. State, 162 P.3d 696 (Haw. 2007). · cites it 2× “" HRS § 88-110 (1993); see Honda II, 108 Hawai`i at 344, 120 P.”
Chun v. Bd. of Trs., 952 P.2d 1215 (Haw. 1998). · cites it 2× “HRS § 88-110 provides: Board; trustees of funds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.