ILCS » Chapter 10 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

10 ILCS 5/9-24 (2026)

The Board may also petition the Circuit Court to issue an order of the Court compelling compliance with an order issued by the Board, or to restrain or prohibit a person who is engaging or has engaged in acts or practices which constitute a violation of any provision of this Article from engaging in such acts or practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(10 ILCS 5/9-24) (from Ch. 46, par. 9-24)
    Sec. 9-24. The Board may also petition the Circuit Court to issue an order of the Court compelling compliance with an order issued by the Board, or to restrain or prohibit a person who is engaging or has engaged in acts or practices which constitute a violation of any provision of this Article from engaging in such acts or practices. If the Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the person of the alleged violator and that a violation has occurred or is occurring by reasons of the acts or practices of such person, the Court shall issue the appropriate order.
(Source: P.A. 78-1183.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–1998 · leading case: Illinois Repub. Party v. State Bd. of Elections, 691 N.E.2d 169 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Illinois Repub. Party v. State Bd. of Elections, 691 N.E.2d 169 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “s related to political campaign disclosure requirements (10 ILCS 5/9-18 (West 1996)), hold hearings on complaints alleging violation of the campaign disclosure requirements of the Election Code (10 ILCS 5/9-21 (West 1996)), impose civil penalties for noncompliance with its…”
Illinois Repub. Party v. Bd. of Elections (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “d to political campaign disclosure re­quire­ments (10 ILCS 5/9-18 (West 1996)), hold hearings on com­plaints alleging violation of the campaign disclosure require­ments of the Election Code (10 ILCS 5/9-21 (West 1996)), im­pose civil pen­al­ties for noncompliance with its orders…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.