ILCS » Chapter 110 · Act 305
Illinois Compiled Statutes

110 ILCS 305/7f (2026)

Partial tuition waivers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(110 ILCS 305/7f) (from Ch. 144, par. 28f)
    Sec. 7f. Partial tuition waivers.
    (a) As used in this Section, "Illinois college or university" means any of the following: the University of Illinois, Southern Illinois University, Chicago State University, Eastern Illinois University, Governors State University, Illinois State University, Northeastern Illinois University, Northern Illinois University, and Western Illinois University.
    (b) Each year the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois shall offer 50% tuition waivers for undergraduate education at any campus under its governance or supervision to the children of employees of an Illinois college or university who have been employed by any one or by more than one Illinois college or university for an aggregate period of at least 7 years. To be eligible to receive a partial tuition waiver, the child of an employee of an Illinois college or university (i) must be under the age of 25 at the commencement of the academic year during which the partial tuition waiver is to be effective, and (ii) must qualify for admission to the University of Illinois under the same admissions requirements, standards and policies which the University of Illinois applies to applicants for admission generally to its respective undergraduate colleges and programs.
    (c) Subject to the provisions and limitations of subsection (b), an eligible applicant who has continued to maintain satisfactory academic progress toward graduation may have his or her partial tuition waiver renewed until the time as he or she has expended 4 years of undergraduate partial tuition waiver benefits under this Section.
    (d) (Blank).
    (e) The Board of Trustees shall prescribe rules and regulations as are necessary to implement and administer the provisions of this Section.
(Source: P.A. 100-824, eff. 8-13-18.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Dusthimer v. Bd. of Trs., 857 N.E.2d 343 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dusthimer v. Bd. of Trs., 857 N.E.2d 343 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 6× “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a `state-supported' institution as contemplated in the [regulations].”
Dusthimer v. The Bd. of Tustees of the Univ. of Illinois (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 3× “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a 'state-supported' institu- tion as contemplated in the [regulations].”
— 110 ILCS 305/7f(a) — 2 cases
Dusthimer v. Bd. of Trs., 857 N.E.2d 343 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a `state-supported' institution as contemplated in the [regulations].”
Dusthimer v. The Bd. of Tustees of the Univ. of Illinois (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a 'state-supported' institu- tion as contemplated in the [regulations].”
— 110 ILCS 305/7f(b) — 2 cases
Dusthimer v. Bd. of Trs., 857 N.E.2d 343 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a `state-supported' institution as contemplated in the [regulations].”
Dusthimer v. The Bd. of Tustees of the Univ. of Illinois (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “' [110 ILCS 305/7f(a) (West 2004).] In conclusion, although it's true that Black Hawk [College] does receive some State money, it is not a 'state-supported' institu- tion as contemplated in the [regulations].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.