Illinois Compiled Statutes
15 ILCS 405/10.05a (2026)
Deductions from Warrants and Payments for Satisfaction of Past Due Child Support
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(15 ILCS 405/10.05a)
(from Ch. 15, par. 210.05a)
Sec. 10.05a. Deductions from Warrants and Payments for Satisfaction of
Past Due Child Support. At the direction of the Department of Healthcare and Family Services,
the Comptroller shall deduct from a warrant or other payment described in
Section 10.05 of this Act, in accordance with the procedures provided
therein, and pay over to the Department or the State Disbursement Unit
established under Section 10-26 of the Illinois Public Aid Code, at the
direction of the Department, that amount certified as necessary
to satisfy, in whole or in part, past due support owed by a person on
account of support action being taken by the Department under Article X of
the Illinois Public Aid Code, whether or not such support is owed to the
State. Such deduction shall have priority over any garnishment except that
for payment of state or federal taxes. In the case of joint payees, the
Comptroller shall deduct and pay over to the Department or the State
Disbursement Unit, as directed by the Department, the entire amount
certified. The Comptroller shall provide the Department with the address to
which the warrant or other payment was to be mailed and the social security
number of each person from whom a deduction is made pursuant to this Section.
(Source: P.A. 95-331, eff. 8-21-07.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1997–1997 · leading case: Brinegar v. Reeves, 681 N.E.2d 1080 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997).
Brinegar v. Reeves, 681 N.E.2d 1080 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “” 15 ILCS 405/ 10.05a (West 1994). In interpreting an earlier version of section 10.”
Brinegar v. Reeves (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “" 15 ILCS 405/10.05a (West 1994). In interpreting an earlier version of section 10.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|