ILCS » Chapter 20 · Act 2520
Illinois Compiled Statutes

20 ILCS 2520/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 2520/1) (from Ch. 120, par. 2301)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act".
(Source: P.A. 86-176; 86-189.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: McLean v. Dep't of Revenue, 704 N.E.2d 352 (Ill. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McLean v. Dep't of Revenue, 704 N.E.2d 352 (Ill. 1998). · cites it 6× “XIV, § 1) and the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act (20 ILCS 2520/1 et seq. (West 1996)). In count II, plaintiff sought reversal of the Department's final decision in administrative review, alleging that: the Department's determination was predicated upon an incorrect interpretation…”
City of Chicago ex rel. Walton v. Prog Leasing, LLC, 2023 IL App (1st) 220714 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “One of the questions before the Beeler court was the following: “ ‘Does the application of the general provisions of the [Whistleblower Act] *** to enforce the sales and use tax laws improperly deprive taxpayers of the specific rights and privileges afforded them under the…”
McLean v. Dept. of Revenue (Ill. 1998). · cites it 3× “XIV, §1) and the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights Act (20 ILCS 2520/1 et seq . (West 1996)). In count II, plaintiff sought reversal of the Department's final decision in administrative review, alleging that: the Department's determination was predicated upon an incorrect interpretation…”
Nat'l RR Passenger Corp. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co., 776 F. Supp. 2d 759 (N.D. Ill. 2011). “) Amtrak alleges that the Department’s actions violated the Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Act, 20 ILCS 2520/1 et seq. That statute, however, provides a private right of action to Illinois taxpayers only if the Department “intentionally or recklessly disregards tax laws or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.