Illinois Compiled Statutes
20 ILCS 3305/3 (2026)
Limitations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 3305/3)
(from Ch. 127, par. 1053)
Sec. 3.
Limitations.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed
to:
(a) Interfere with the course or conduct of a labor dispute, except that
actions otherwise authorized by this Act or other laws may be taken when
necessary to mitigate imminent or existing danger to public
health or safety;
(b) Interfere with dissemination of news or comment of
public affairs; but any communications facility or organization (including
but not limited to radio and television stations, wire services, and
newspapers) may be requested to transmit or print public service messages
furnishing information or instructions in connection with a disaster;
(c) Affect the jurisdiction or responsibilities of police forces, fire
fighting
forces, units of the armed forces of the United States, or of any personnel
thereof, when on active duty; but State and political subdivision
emergency operations plans shall place reliance upon the forces available
for performance of functions related to emergency management;
(d) Limit,
modify, or abridge the authority of the Governor to proclaim martial law or
exercise any other powers vested in the Governor under the
constitution, statutes, or
common law of this State, independent of or in conjunction with any
provisions of this Act;
limit any home rule unit; or prohibit any contract
or association pursuant to Article VII, Section 10 of the Illinois
Constitution.
(Source: P.A. 92-73, eff. 1-1-02.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2021 · leading case: Stephen Cassell v. David Snyders, 990 F.3d 539 (7th Cir. 2021).
Stephen Cassell v. David Snyders, 990 F.3d 539 (7th Cir. 2021). “See 20 ILCS 3305/3 (providing three exceptions to governor’s emergency power to limit venue capacity, none of which refer to religion).”
Landers v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App (4th) 200356-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Plaintiffs disagree and argue - 15 - the Governor lacked authority to issue Executive Order 2020-50 under section 7(1) of the Act (20 ILCS 3305/7(1) (West 2018)), because several provisions of the Code (730 ILCS 5/3-2-2, 3- 2-5, 3-8-1, 5-8-5, 5-8-6 (West 2018)) and section 3(c)…”
— 20 ILCS 3305/3(c) — 1 case
Landers v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App (4th) 200356-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Plaintiffs disagree and argue - 15 - the Governor lacked authority to issue Executive Order 2020-50 under section 7(1) of the Act (20 ILCS 3305/7(1) (West 2018)), because several provisions of the Code (730 ILCS 5/3-2-2, 3- 2-5, 3-8-1, 5-8-5, 5-8-6 (West 2018)) and section 3(c)…”
— 20 ILCS 3305/3(d) — 1 case
Landers v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App (4th) 200356-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Plaintiffs disagree and argue - 15 - the Governor lacked authority to issue Executive Order 2020-50 under section 7(1) of the Act (20 ILCS 3305/7(1) (West 2018)), because several provisions of the Code (730 ILCS 5/3-2-2, 3- 2-5, 3-8-1, 5-8-5, 5-8-6 (West 2018)) and section 3(c)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|