ILCS » Chapter 20 · Act 3960
Illinois Compiled Statutes

20 ILCS 3960/11 (2026)

Any person who is adversely affected by a final decision of the State Board may have such decision judicially reviewed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 3960/11) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1161)
    (Section scheduled to be repealed on December 31, 2029)
    Sec. 11. Any person who is adversely affected by a final decision of the State Board may have such decision judicially reviewed. The provisions of the Administrative Review Law, as now or hereafter amended, and the rules adopted pursuant thereto shall apply to and govern all proceedings for the judicial review of final administrative decisions of the State Board. The term "administrative decisions" is as defined in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In order to comply with subsection (b) of Section 3-108 of the Administrative Review Law of the Code of Civil Procedure, the State Board shall transcribe each State Board meeting using a certified court reporter. The transcript shall contain the record of the findings and decisions of the State Board.
(Source: P.A. 98-1086, eff. 8-26-14.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: Marion Hosp. Corp. v. Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 746 N.E.2d 880 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marion Hosp. Corp. v. Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 746 N.E.2d 880 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “Section 3—103 of the Administrative Review Law requires that an action for administrative review “shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint and the issuance of summons within 35 days from the date that a copy of the decision sought to be reviewed was served upon the party…”
Provena Health v. Illinois Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 886 N.E.2d 1054 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 2004) . Provena contended the Board’s decision to award Sherman a permit would reduce Provena’s net income by $8.”
Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty., & Mun. Employees, Council 31 v. Ryan, 332 Ill. App. 3d 866 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “” 20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 2000). Surely, if a prisoner can sue for mandamus to ensure the Department of Corrections' (DOC's) compliance with DOC administrative rules governing grievance procedures, the guardians of residents at the Lincoln Developmental Center can sue for…”
Am. Fed. of State, Cnty. v. Ryan, 773 N.E.2d 739 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “" 20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 2000). Surely, if a prisoner can sue for mandamus to ensure the Department of Corrections' (DOC's) compliance with DOC administrative rules governing grievance procedures, the guardians of residents at the Lincoln Developmental Center can sue for…”
Marion Hosp. Corp. v. Illinois Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 777 N.E.2d 924 (Ill. 2002). “40(e) (1996)), sought judicial review in the circuit court of Cook County, as provided for in section 11 of the Planning Act (20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 1998)). Marion’s complaint named as defendants SIOC, the Associates and SIHS (collectively SIOC), as well as the Board, its…”
Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Employees, Council 31 v. Ryan, 807 N.E.2d 1235 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “See 20 ILCS 3960/6 (West 2002) (requiring that the Planning Board make certain factual findings prior to issuing a permit, including a finding “that safeguards are provided which assure that the *** modification of the health care facility *** is consistent with the public…”
Springwood Assocs. v. Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 646 N.E.2d 1374 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “First CareAmerica’s application was considered at the October 28, 1993, meeting of the Board, at which time the Board voted to approve the application. The Board adopted the Department’s report as its findings.”
Cathedral Rock of Granite City, Inc. v. Illinois Health Facilities Plan. Bd., 720 N.E.2d 1113 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “(Cathedral), a competing nursing facility, appealed the decision to the circuit court of Sangamon County pursuant to section 11 of the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act (Planning Act) (20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 1998)). The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision.”
Dimensions Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Advanced Ambulatory Surgical Ctr., Inc., 712 N.E.2d 880 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “” 20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 1996). In Condell Hospital v.”
Dimensions Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Elmhurst Outpatient Surgery Ctr., L.L.C., 718 N.E.2d 249 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “’ 20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 1996). In Condell Hospital v.”
Blessing Hosp. v. Illinois Health Facilities & Servs. Review Bd., 2024 IL App (4th) 230282 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “The complaint alleged that Blessing Hospital was adversely affected by the May 4 decision and, therefore, had standing to bring the administrative review under section 11 of the Illinois Health Facilities Planning Act (Planning Act) (20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 2022)). Although the…”
Dimensions Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Suburban Endoscopy Ctr., 697 N.E.2d 1231 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “” 20 ILCS 3960/11 (West 1996). In Condell Hospital v.”
Show all 23 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.