ILCS » Chapter 20 · Act 4026
Illinois Compiled Statutes

20 ILCS 4026/16 (2026)

Sex offender evaluation and identification required

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 4026/16)
    Sec. 16. Sex offender evaluation and identification required.
    (a) Beginning on January 1, 2004, each felony sex offender who is to be considered for probation shall be required as part of the pre-sentence or social investigation to submit to an evaluation for treatment, an evaluation for risk, and procedures for monitoring of behavior to protect victims and potential victims pursuant to item (1) of subsection (f) of Section 15 of this Act.
    (b) Beginning on January 1, 2014, the evaluation required by subsection (a) of this Section shall be by a sex offender evaluator or associate sex offender provider as defined in Section 10 of this Act and shall be at the expense of the person evaluated, based upon that person's ability to pay for such treatment.
(Source: P.A. 97-1098, eff. 1-1-13.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2009–2011 · leading case: People v. Hillier, 931 N.E.2d 1184 (Ill. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Hillier, 931 N.E.2d 1184 (Ill. 2010). “See 730 ILCS 5/5— 3 — 2(b—5) (West 2006); 20 ILCS 4026/16(a) (West 2006). 2 Defendant has forfeited this claim.”
People v. Hillier, 910 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “20 ILCS 4026/16 (West 2006); 730 ILCS 5/5-3-2(b-5) (West 2006).”
In re Det. of Lieberman, 2011 IL App (1st) 90796 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “, 20 ILCS 4026/16 (West 2010); 725 ILCS 207/55, 60, 65 (West 2008).”
People v. Hillier (Ill. 2010). “See 730 ILCS 5/5–3–2(b–5) (West 2006); 20 ILCS 4026/16(a) (West 2006).2 1 Defendant did not advance an Apprendi argument in either the appellate court or this court.”
— 20 ILCS 4026/16(a) — 2 cases
People v. Hillier, 931 N.E.2d 1184 (Ill. 2010). “See 730 ILCS 5/5— 3 — 2(b—5) (West 2006); 20 ILCS 4026/16(a) (West 2006). 2 Defendant has forfeited this claim.”
People v. Hillier (Ill. 2010). “See 730 ILCS 5/5–3–2(b–5) (West 2006); 20 ILCS 4026/16(a) (West 2006).2 1 Defendant did not advance an Apprendi argument in either the appellate court or this court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.