ILCS » Chapter 20 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

20 ILCS 5/5-95 (2026)

Pending actions and proceedings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(20 ILCS 5/5-95) (was 20 ILCS 5/34)
    Sec. 5-95. Pending actions and proceedings. Neither the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois nor any amendments to the Code shall affect any act done, ratified, or confirmed, or any right accrued or established, or any action or proceeding had or commenced in a civil or criminal cause before the Code or any amendments to the Code take effect. Those actions or proceedings may be prosecuted and continued by the department having jurisdiction, under the Code or any amendments to the Code, of the subject matter to which the litigation or proceeding pertains.
(Source: P.A. 91-239, eff. 1-1-00.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2013–2016 · leading case: People v. Wilson, 2016 IL App (1st) 141500 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Wilson, 2016 IL App (1st) 141500 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Similarly, the savings clause of the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois (20 ILCS 5/5-95 (West 2012)) is inapplicable to our analysis.”
Consiglio v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2013 IL App (1st) 121142 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “332, 340-41 (1952) (“It has been universally held that a license to practice medicine is a ‘property right,’ within the meaning 1 Because we find that the Act is not retroactive in nature, we reject the plaintiffs’ arguments that the savings clauses of the Statute on Statutes (5…”
Hayashi v. Illinois Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2014 IL 116023 (Ill. 2015). “The savings clause of the Civil Administrative Code (20 ILCS 5/5-95 (West 2012)), is irrelevant to our analysis for the same reason.”
Hayashi v. Illinois Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2014 IL 116023 (Ill. 2014). “The savings clause of the Civil Administrative Code (20 ILCS 5/5-95 (West 2012)), is irrelevant to our analysis for the same reason.”
Hayashi v. Illinois Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2014 IL 116023 (Ill. 2014). “The savings clause of the Civil Administrative Code (20 ILCS 5/5-95 (West 2012)), is irrelevant to our analysis for the same reason.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.