ILCS » Chapter 215 · Act 153
Illinois Compiled Statutes

215 ILCS 153/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 153/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Structured Settlement Protection Act.
(Source: P.A. 93-502, eff. 1-1-04.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2013 · leading case: Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Ins., 850 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Ins., 850 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “, pursuant to the Structured Settlement Protection Act (Act) (215 ILCS 153/1 et seq. (West 2004)), for court approval of a transfer of a portion of Mary Foreman’s structured settlement payment rights.”
In Re Foreman, 850 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “, pursuant to the Structured Settlement Protection Act (Act) (215 ILCS 153/1 et seq. (West 2004)), for court approval of a transfer of a portion of Mary Foreman's structured settlement payment rights.”
Hartford Life Ins. v. Solomon, 910 F. Supp. 2d 1075 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “) Pursuant to the Illinois Structured Settlement Protection Act, 215 ILCS 153/1 et seq., 321 Henderson petitioned a state court to approve the transfer.”
Settlement Funding, LLC v. Brenston, 2013 IL App (4th) 120869 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “The appeals challenge the validity of the trial court’s orders granting two petitions filed by Settlement Funding, pursuant to the Structured Settlement Protection Act (Act) (215 ILCS 153/1 to 35 (West 2008)), seeking court approval for the transfer of certain structured…”
In re Foreman (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “, pursuant to the Structured Settlement Protection Act (Act) (215 ILCS 153/1 et seq. (West 2004)), for court approval of a transfer of a portion of Mary Foreman's structured settlement payment rights.”
In re Morey, 71 Va. Cir. 435 (Portsmouth Cir. Ct. 2005). “Both substantive and procedural provisions easily can be termed reasonably comparable. Clearly, the exhibits (including a transcript) reveal proper jurisdiction for the Illinois proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.