Illinois Compiled Statutes
215 ILCS 5/221.10 (2026)
Declaration of purpose
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 5/221.10)
(from Ch. 73, par. 833.10)
Sec. 221.10.
Declaration of purpose.
The purpose of Sections 221.1 to 221.10, both inclusive is to promote
uniformity in the liquidation, rehabilitation, reorganization or
conservation of insurers doing business in more than one state. It is
intended that Sections 221.1 to 221.10, both inclusive shall be liberally
construed to the end that so far as possible the assets of such insurers
shall be equally and uniformly conserved in all states, and that claimants
against such insurers shall receive equal and uniform treatment
irrespective of residence or the place of the acts or contracts upon which
their claims are based. The provisions of Sections 221.1 to 221.10, both
inclusive shall be effective only with respect to this state and other
states in which (a) it is provided by law that only the Insurance
Commissioner or equivalent supervisory official of the State shall be
vested with title to the assets of, and shall wind up the affairs of,
delinquent insurers under judicial supervision; and (b) in substance and
effect the provisions of Sections 221.1 to 221.10, both inclusive, are in
force. The provisions of Sections 221.1 to 221.10, both inclusive, insofar
as applicable to any insurer incorporated or organized in a foreign
country, shall apply only to the assets, liabilities and business of such
insurer within the several states.
(Source: Laws 1941, vol. 1, p. 832.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Saf.-Kleen Corp. v. Canadian Universal Ins., 631 N.E.2d 475 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994).
Saf.-Kleen Corp. v. Canadian Universal Ins., 631 N.E.2d 475 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “(215 ILCS 5/221.10 (West 1992).) With regard to insurance company liquidation, it is the policy of this State that, so far as possible, "the assets of [insolvent] insurers shall be equally and uniformly conserved in all states, and that claimants against such insurers shall…”
Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Safway Steel Prods., Inc., 822 N.E.2d 79 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “10 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/221.10 (West 2000)) because of Reliance’s liquidation status.”
Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Safway Steel Prods., 822 N.E.2d 79 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “10 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/221.10 (West 2000)) because of Reliance's liquidation status.”
People Ex Rel. Hammer v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. (In Re Liquidation of Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.), 2018 IL App (1st) 170996 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Because insurers are barred from seeking federal bankruptcy protection, the UILA establishes an alternative statutory scheme and provides a uniform method for processing claims against, and distributing assets of, insolvent insurance companies with assets and policyholders in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|