Illinois Compiled Statutes
225 ILCS 60/35 (2026)
The Secretary shall have the authority to appoint an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the State of Illinois to serve as the hearing officer in any action to suspend, revoke, place on probationary status, or take any other disciplinary action with regard to a license
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 60/35)
(from Ch. 111, par. 4400-35)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2027)
Sec. 35.
The Secretary shall have the authority to
appoint an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the
State of Illinois to serve as the hearing officer in any
action to suspend, revoke, place on probationary status, or
take any other disciplinary action with regard to a license.
The hearing officer shall have full authority to conduct the
hearing. The hearing officer shall report his findings and
recommendations to the Medical Board within 30 days of
the receipt of the record. The Medical Board shall
have 60 days from receipt of the report to review the report
of the hearing officer and present their findings of fact,
conclusions of law and recommendations to the Secretary.
(Source: P.A. 102-20, eff. 1-1-22.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003).
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). “*1163 Following the hearing, the administrative law judge issued her findings and recommendations in accordance with section 35 of the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/35 (West 1998)). The administrative law judge concluded that the Department had proved all three counts of its…”
Kafin v. Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2012 IL App (1st) 111875 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “” 225 ILCS 60/35 (West 2008). This section does not require that a Board member be present at a plaintiff’s hearing.”
Siddiqui v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 718 N.E.2d 217 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “225 ILCS 60/35 (West 1992). It does not explicitly require service of the report.”
Vasanwala v. Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2024 IL App (4th) 220933 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “225 ILCS 60/35 (West 2022); 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1110.”
Parikh v. Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2014 IL App (1st) 123319 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “) 225 ILCS 60/35 (West 2010). Therefore, we conclude that legislative authority grants the Director the authority to agree and act on the majority of the Board's recommendation or to disagree with the findings and recommendations of the Board subject to the standard of judicial…”
Vasanwala v. The Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2023 IL App (4th) 220933-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “225 ILCS 60/35 (West 2022); 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1110.”
Dobrescu v. Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2024 IL App (1st) 231014-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “225 ILCS 60/35, 60/40; 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1110.”
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. 2003). “Following the hearing, the administrative law judge issued her findings and recommendations in accordance with section 35 of the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/35 (West 1998)). The administrative law judge concluded that the Department had proved all three counts of its…”
Siddiqui v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “225 ILCS 60/35 (West 1992). It does not explicitly require service of the report.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|