ILCS » Chapter 225 · Act 60
Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 60/7 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 60/7) (from Ch. 111, par. 4400-7)
    Sec. 7. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 102-813, eff. 5-13-22. Repealed internally, eff. 1-1-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2000–2017 · leading case: Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). · cites it 16× “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department's administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Albazzaz v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 731 N.E.2d 787 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2000). “Such a perspective obviously entails a recognition of the considerable ramifications of suspending a license, and therefore suspension as a sanction is not likely to be lightly imposed.”
Taylor v. Dart, 2017 IL App (1st) 143684-B. “¶ 25 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)) required that all Board members be appointed and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and with…”
Taylor v. Dart, 2016 IL App (1st) 143684, 64 N.E.3d 123. “1-14-3684 ¶ 23 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by…”
Taylor v. Dart, 2016 IL App (1st) 143684. “¶ 23 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and with…”
Taylor v. Dart, 2017 IL App (1st) 143684-B, 81 N.E.3d 1. “¶ 25 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required that all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and…”
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., No. 94073 Rel (Ill. Nov. 20, 2003). · cites it 8× “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department’s administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Taylor v. Dart, 2017 IL App (1st) 143684-B. “¶ 25 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required that all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and…”
Albazzaz v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg., No. 1-98-3133 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. May 11, 2000). “Such a perspective obviously entails a recognition of the considerable ramifications of suspending a license, and therefore suspension as a sanction is not likely to be lightly imposed.”
225 ILCS 60/7(A): 9 cases
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department's administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Albazzaz v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 731 N.E.2d 787 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2000). “Such a perspective obviously entails a recognition of the considerable ramifications of suspending a license, and therefore suspension as a sanction is not likely to be lightly imposed.”
Taylor v. Dart, 2017 IL App (1st) 143684-B. “¶ 25 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)) required that all Board members be appointed and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and with…”
Taylor v. Dart, 2016 IL App (1st) 143684, 64 N.E.3d 123. “1-14-3684 ¶ 23 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by…”
Taylor v. Dart, 2016 IL App (1st) 143684. “¶ 23 In affirming the decision of the circuit court, the supreme court noted that section 7(A) of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Practice Act) (225 ILCS 60/7(A) (West 1998)), required all Board members be appointed by and their vacancies filled “by the Governor by and with…”
225 ILCS 60/7(B): 2 cases
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department's administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., No. 94073 Rel (Ill. Nov. 20, 2003). “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department’s administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
225 ILCS 60/7(E): 2 cases
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department's administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., No. 94073 Rel (Ill. Nov. 20, 2003). “Cook on the Medical Disciplinary Board was not authorized by the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/7 (West 1998)), the Department’s administrative complaint was defective, and the Department had failed to prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.