Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 720/8.10 (2026)

Review under Administrative Review Law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 720/8.10) (from Ch. 96 1/2, par. 7908.10)
    Sec. 8.10. Review under Administrative Review Law. All final administrative decisions of the Department under this Act shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to the Administrative Review Law, as amended, and the rules adopted under it, except that the remedies created by this Act are not excluded or impaired by any provision of the Administrative Review Law.
(Source: P.A. 90-655, eff. 7-30-98.)


 
    (225 ILCS 720/Art. IX heading)
ARTICLE IX: ADMINISTRATION

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2012 · leading case: Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A., 2012 IL 111286 (Ill. 2012).
Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A., 2012 IL 111286 (Ill. 2012). · cites it 2× “10 of the Mining Act (225 ILCS 720/8.10 (West 2008)). ¶9 In June 2005, Langenhorst filed a citizen complaint with the United States Department 3 The revised Permit No.”
Midland Coal Co. v. Knox Cnty., 644 N.E.2d 796 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “The Surface Coal Mining Land Conservation and Reclamation Act (225 ILCS 720/1.”
Citizens Opposing Pollution v. Exxonmobil Coal U.S.A., 936 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “All final administrative decisions of the Department under this Act shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to the Administrative Review Law, as amended, and the rules adopted under it, except that the remedies created by this Act are not excluded or impaired by any…”
Citizens Opposing Pollution v. ExxonMobil Coal U.S.A. (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “All final administrative decisions of the Department under this Act shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to the Administrative Review Law, as amended, and the rules adopted under it, except that the remedies created by this Act are not excluded or impaired by any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.