Illinois Compiled Statutes
225 ILCS 725/23.1 (2026)
The owner or owners of any tract of land which is productive or capable of being productive of oil or gas or any owner or operator of an oil and gas leasehold on which productive wells are situated, under a lease authorizing the lessee or his assigns to explore for and remove oil and gas, from any sand, strata, or formation, shall be permitted, in the interest of oil and gas conservation, to use any enhanced recovery method for the purpose of recovering the oil and gas contained therein; provided, that the owner or operator of a well to be used for any enhanced recovery method shall make a written application to the Department for authority so to do, and provided that written approval has been granted him by the Department; and provided further that the operation shall be done under the rules and regulations of the Department; and further provided, that use of any enhanced recovery method shall not be deemed to be an unlawful act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 725/23.1)
(from Ch. 96 1/2, par. 5438)
Sec. 23.1.
The owner or owners of any tract of land which is productive or
capable of being productive of oil or gas or any owner or operator of an
oil and gas leasehold on which productive wells are situated, under a lease
authorizing the lessee or his assigns to explore for and remove oil and
gas, from any sand, strata, or formation, shall be permitted, in the
interest of oil and gas conservation, to use any enhanced recovery
method
for the purpose of recovering the oil and gas contained therein; provided,
that the owner or operator of a well to be used for any enhanced recovery
method shall make a written
application to the Department for authority so to do,
and provided that
written approval has been granted him by the Department; and provided
further that the operation shall be done under the rules and regulations of
the Department; and further provided, that use of any
enhanced recovery
method shall
not be deemed to be an unlawful act.
(Source: P.A. 85-1334.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2000–2000 · leading case: John O. Schofield, Inc. v. Nikkel, 731 N.E.2d 915 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000).
John O. Schofield, Inc. v. Nikkel, 731 N.E.2d 915 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “See 225 ILCS 725/23.1 through 23.16 (West 1998).”
John O. Schofield, Inc. v. Nikkel (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “See 225 ILCS 725/23.1 through 23.16 (West 1998).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|