Illinois Compiled Statutes
30 ILCS 115/3 (2026)
Use of Fund
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(30 ILCS 115/3)
(from Ch. 85, par. 613)
Sec. 3.
Use of Fund.
The amounts allocated and paid to the municipalities
and counties of this State pursuant to the provisions of this Act shall be
used solely for the general welfare of the people of the State of Illinois,
including financial assistance to school districts, any part of which lie
within the municipality or county, through unrestricted block grants for
school purposes carried out within the municipality or county making the
grant, and also including, but not limited to, mental health programs,
wastewater projects, road and bridge construction and repair and social
service programs.
(Source: P.A. 86-18.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2010–2011 · leading case: Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Municipalities and counties must use such funds “solely for the general welfare of the people of the State of Illinois, including financial assistance to school districts, any part of which lie within the municipality or county, through unrestricted block grants for school…”
People Ex Rel. Alvarez v. Price, 948 N.E.2d 174 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “42 (West 2008) (contracting for traffic regulation in parking areas); 65 ILCS 5/11—6—2 (West 2008) (contracting for fire protection). The State also argued that a conflict existed between an alderman’s duties in voting on the allocation of revenue-sharing funds to a school…”
Rajterowski v. The City of Sycamore (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Municipalities and counties must use such funds "solely for the general welfare of the people of the State of Illinois, including financial assistance to school districts, any part of which lie within the municipality or county, through unrestricted block grants for school…”
People ex rel. Alvarez v. Price (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The State also argued that a conflict existed between an alderman's duties in voting on the allocation of revenue-sharing funds to a school district (30 ILCS 115/3 (West 2008)) and a school board member's duty to provide revenue to maintain the schools (105 ILCS 5/10-20.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|