Illinois Compiled Statutes

30 ILCS 605/7c (2026)

Acquisition of Illinois State Police vehicles

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(30 ILCS 605/7c)
    Sec. 7c. Acquisition of Illinois State Police vehicles.
    (a) The State Police Vehicle Fund is created as a special fund in the State treasury. All moneys in the Fund, subject to appropriation, shall be used by the Illinois State Police:
        (1) for the acquisition of vehicles for the Illinois
    
State Police;
        (2) for debt service on bonds issued to finance the
    
acquisition of vehicles for the Illinois State Police; or
        (3) for the maintenance and operation of vehicles
    
for the Illinois State Police.
    (b) (Blank).
(Source: P.A. 102-505, eff. 8-20-21; 102-538, eff. 8-20-21; 102-813, eff. 5-13-22; 103-363, eff. 7-28-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Friedman v. White, 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Friedman v. White, 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “The statute required the $1 surcharge to be deposited into the State Police Vehicle Fund, which was used to acquire state police vehicles (see 30 ILCS 605/7c (West 2014)). Subject-vehicle owners were more likely than other citizens to require the assistance of the state police,…”
Friedman v. White, 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “The statute required the $1 surcharge to be deposited into the State Police Vehicle Fund, which was -3- 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 used to acquire state police vehicles (see 30 ILCS 605/7c (West 2014)). Subject-vehicle owners were more likely than other citizens to require the…”
Friedman v. White, 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “The statute required the $1 surcharge to be deposited into the State Police Vehicle Fund, which was -3- 2015 IL App (2d) 140942 used to acquire state police vehicles (see 30 ILCS 605/7c (West 2014)). Subject-vehicle owners were more likely than other citizens to require the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.