Illinois Compiled Statutes
35 ILCS 200/22-85 (2026)
Failure to timely take out and record deed; deed is void
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 200/22-85)
Sec. 22-85.
Failure to timely take out and record deed; deed is void.
Unless the holder of the certificate purchased at any tax sale under this Code
takes out the deed in the time provided by law, and records the same within one
year from and after the time for redemption expires, the certificate or deed,
and the sale on which it is based, shall, after the expiration of the one year
period, be absolutely void with no right to reimbursement. If the holder of
the certificate is prevented from obtaining a deed by injunction or order of
any court, or by the refusal or inability of any court to act upon the
application for a tax deed, or by the refusal of the clerk to execute the same
deed, the time he or she is so prevented shall be excluded from computation of
the one year period. Certificates of purchase and deeds executed by the clerk
shall recite the qualifications required in this Section.
(Source: P.A. 87-669; 88-455.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: In re Application of the Cnty. Treasurer, 2012 IL App (1st) 101976 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
In re Application of the Cnty. Treasurer, 2012 IL App (1st) 101976 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “OPINION ¶1 After the trial court issued an order directing the issuance of a tax deed to petitioner CCPI, respondent MB Financial Bank filed a motion to: (count I) declare the tax deed void, pursuant to section 22-85 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2008)); and…”
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Sass Muni v (In Re Will Cnty. Collector), 2018 IL App (3d) 160659 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “In its petition, Citi argued in the alternative that: (1) the tax deed was void with no right to reimbursement under section 22-85 of the Illinois Property Tax Code (Code) (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2012) ) because SASS failed to record the deed within one year of the expiration…”
In Re Bates, 270 B.R. 455 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2001). “” 35 ILCS 200/22-85; see Karlen & Slutzky, § 5.”
In re Application of the Will Cnty. Collector, 2018 IL App (3d) 160659 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “In its petition, Citi argued in the alternative that (1) the tax deed was void with no right to reimbursement under section 22-85 of the Property Tax Code (Code) (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2012)) because SASS failed to record the deed within one year of the expiration of the…”
Lyubomir Alexandrov v. Todd LaMont, 740 F.3d 397 (7th Cir. 2014). “See 35 ILCS 200/22-85; 21-310(b)(l). Any solu *411 tion to that problem is for the courts or legislature of Illinois.”
In re Application of the Cnty. Collector, 2014 IL App (2d) 140223 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Since neither of those events occurred by that date, the certificate of purchase became void with no right to reimbursement pursuant to section 22-85 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2012)). ¶ 10 On November 1, 2013, the trial court denied the petitioner’s…”
In re Application of the Cnty. Treasurer & ex officio Cnty. Collector of Cook Cnty., 2023 IL App (1st) 220070 (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “Under count I, DJJ alleged the motion to issue tax deed was void under section 22-85 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2016)) because (1) the redemption period expired without a request for extension and before the filing of the -4- No.”
In re Application for a Tax Deed, 2021 IL 126150 (Ill. 2021). “OPINION ¶1 The appellants, SI Resources, LLC, and Cadijah Brown, filed a two-count motion to void a tax deed because it was not issued and recorded within one year after the expiration of the statutory redemption period following the tax sale, as required by section 22-85 of the…”
In Re Cnty. Treasurer, 869 N.E.2d 1065 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “See 35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2002). Moreover, petitioner did not obtain the titles to the properties until the clerk conveyed the deeds to it.”
In Re Commings, 297 B.R. 701 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2003). “35 ILCS 200/22-85 (2002). c. The Bankruptcy On September 16, 2002, the debtors still having failed to redeem the property, NIC duly filed its petition for tax deed in state court under section 22-30 of the Property Tax Code.”
In re Application for a Tax Deed, 2020 IL App (5th) 190168 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Castleman and Opal Castleman, SI Resources, LLC (SI Resources) and Cadijah Brown (Brown) (collectively, petitioners) filed a two-count pleading against the Castlemans and the Castlemans’ successors in interest, William Groome and Vicki Groome, seeking to declare the tax deed…”
In re Application of the Cnty. Treasurer & ex officio Cnty. Collector, 2013 IL App (3d) 120999 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “-4- petition, Lincoln Title alleged that the tax deed was void because it had not been recorded by Nomanbhoy within one year after the redemption date as required by section 22-85 of the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/22-85 (West 2010)). Lincoln Title claimed that the legal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|