ILCS » Chapter 35 · Act 200
Illinois Compiled Statutes

35 ILCS 200/6-5 (2026)

Appointed boards of review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 200/6-5)
    Sec. 6-5. Appointed boards of review. In counties under township organization with less than 3,000,000 inhabitants in which no board of review is elected under Section 6-35, there shall be an appointed board of review to review the assessments made by the supervisor of assessments. When there is no existing appointed board of review, the chairman of the county board shall appoint, with approval of the county board, 3 citizens of the county to comprise the board of review for that county, 2 to serve for a one year term commencing on the following June 1, and one to serve for a 2 year term commencing on the same date. When an appointed board of review already exists, successors shall be appointed and qualified to serve for terms of 2 years commencing on June 1 of the year of appointment and until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies shall be filled in like manner as original appointments, for the balance of the unexpired term. Members of the county board may be appointed to the board of review. A member of the board of review may be reappointed. No person may serve on the board of review who is not qualified by experience and training in property appraisal and property tax administration.
(Source: P.A. 86-905; 87-1189; 88-455.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2004–2004 · leading case: Merisant Co. v. Kankakee Cnty. Bd. of Review (Ill. App. Ct. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Merisant Co. v. Kankakee Cnty. Bd. of Review (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “(The Property Tax Code adopted the Administrative Review Law for review of all final administrative decisions of the Department of Revenue (35 ILCS 200/8-40 (West 2002)) and PTAB (35 ILCS 200/16-195 (West 2002)).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.