Illinois Compiled Statutes
40 ILCS 5/16-200 (2026)
Administrative review
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/16-200)
(from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 16-200)
Sec. 16-200.
Administrative review.
The Administrative Review Law, and
all amendments and modifications thereof, and the rules adopted pursuant
thereto, shall apply to and govern all proceedings for the judicial review
of final administrative decisions of the board provided for under this
Article. The term "administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101
of the Code of Civil Procedure. The venue for actions brought under the
Administrative Review Law shall be Sangamon County.
(Source: P.A. 87-794.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2012–2015 · leading case: Kildeer-Countryside Sch. Dist. No. 96 v. Bd. of Trs. of the Teachers' Ret. Sys., 2012 IL App (4th) 110843 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
Kildeer-Countryside Sch. Dist. No. 96 v. Bd. of Trs. of the Teachers' Ret. Sys., 2012 IL App (4th) 110843 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “May 30, 2008). Accordingly, this court has jurisdiction of this appeal under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 301 (eff.”
Mannheim Sch. Dist. No. 83 v. Teachers' Ret. Sys. of Illinois, 2015 IL App (4th) 140531 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “It is the Board that makes final administrative decisions subject to judicial review (40 ILCS 5/16-200 (West 2012)) and is the proper party "[t]o sue and be sued" (40 ILCS 5/16- 171 (West 2012)).”
Mannheim Sch. Dist. No. 83 v. Teachers' Ret. Sys. of Illinois, 2015 IL App (4th) 140531 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “It is the Board that makes final administrative decisions subject to judicial review (40 ILCS 5/16-200 (West 2012)) and is the proper party “[t]o sue and be sued” (40 ILCS 5/16-171 (West 2012)).”
Nuzzi v. The Bd. of Trs. of the Teachers' Ret. Sys. of the State of Illinois, 2015 IL App (4th) 140401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Last, plaintiffs argue their disability benefits should not be terminated under section 16-149(c) because they were not gainfully employed at Olivet Nazarene University.”
Nuzzi v. Bd. of Trs. of the Teachers' Ret. Sys., 2015 IL App (4th) 140401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Last, plaintiffs argue their disability benefits should not be terminated under section 16-149(c) because they were not gainfully employed at Olivet Nazarene University.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|