ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5

40 ILCS 5/3-148

Administrative review

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/3-148) (from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 3-148)
    Sec. 3-148. Administrative review. Except as it relates to any time limitation to correct a mistake as provided in Section 3-144.2, the provisions of the Administrative Review Law, and all amendments and modifications thereof and the rules adopted pursuant thereto, shall apply to and govern all proceedings for the judicial review of final administrative decisions of the retirement board provided for under this Article. The term "administrative decision" is as defined in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(Source: P.A. 98-1117, eff. 8-26-14.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension Board
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marconi v. Chicago Heights Police Pension Board (2007) ill “Section 3-148 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2002)) provides that judicial review of the decision of the Board is governed by the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Lelis v. Board of Trustees of the Cicero Police Pension Fund (2013) illappct · cites it 2× “40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2010); Rutka v. Board of Trustees of the Cicero Police Pension Board, 405 Ill App.”
Robbins v. Board of Trustees of the Carbondale Police Pension Fund (1997) ill “40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 1994). The Administrative Review Law provides that our review extends to all questions of law and fact presented by the entire record.”
Carrillo v. Park Ridge Firefighters' Pension Fund (2014) illappct “40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2012). Under the Administrative Review Law, we may not consider new or additional evidence beyond what was originally presented to the Board, and the “findings and conclusions of the administrative agency on questions of fact shall be held to be prima facie…”
Rose v. Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Police Pension Fund (2011) illappct “Section 3-148 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2006)) provides that judicial review of the decision of the Board is governed by the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Village of Alsip v. Portincaso (2017) illappct “Subsequently, Portincaso filed his notice of appeal on October 30, 2015.”
Filskov v. Board of Trustees of the Northlake Police Pension Fund (2011) illappct “No new or additional evidence in support of or in opposition to any finding, order, determination or decision of the administrative agency shall be heard by the court.”
Keeling v. Board of Trustees of the Forest Park Police Pension Fund (2017) illappct “Timeliness of the Disability Claim ¶ 23 On appeal, the Board first asserts that it properly determined Keeling's claim was untimely because he failed to file the designated application form while still employed as a police officer. We agree.”
Village of Hanover Park v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Hanover Park Police Pension Fund (2021) illappct “¶ 49 Section 3-148 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2018)), which applies to the Board, provides that the Administrative Review Law governs the review of final pension board decisions.”
Eschbach v. McHenry Police Pension Board (2012) illappct “Section 3-148 of the Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148 (West 2010)) provides that judicial review of a decision by the Board is governed by the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Gatz v. The Board of Trustees of the Maywood Police Pension Fund (2019) illappct “Section 3-148 of the Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148) (West 2016)) states that judicial review of the Board’s decisions is governed by the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3- 101 et seq.”
Gatz v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Maywood Police Pension Fund (2020) illappct “Section 3-148 of the Code (40 ILCS 5/3-148) (West 2016)) states that judicial review of the Board’s decisions is governed by the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.