ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

40 ILCS 5/8-173.1 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/8-173.1)
    Sec. 8-173.1. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 98-641, eff. 6-9-14. Repealed by P.A. 100-23, eff. 7-6-17.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Jones v. Mun. Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2016 IL 119618 (Ill. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Mun. Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2016 IL 119618 (Ill. 2016). · cites it 3× “40 ILCS 5/8-173.1, 11-169.1 (West 2014). For example, the Act provides that the Funds may bring a mandamus action at their discretion if the City fails to make its required annual contributions, and limits any repayment plans to those that do not “significantly imperil[ ] the…”
— 40 ILCS 5/8-173.1(a) — 1 case
Jones v. Mun. Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2016 IL 119618 (Ill. 2016). “40 ILCS 5/8-173.1, 11-169.1 (West 2014). For example, the Act provides that the Funds may bring a mandamus action at their discretion if the City fails to make its required annual contributions, and limits any repayment plans to those that do not “significantly imperil[ ] the…”
— 40 ILCS 5/8-173.1(b) — 1 case
Jones v. Mun. Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund, 2016 IL 119618 (Ill. 2016). “40 ILCS 5/8-173.1, 11-169.1 (West 2014). For example, the Act provides that the Funds may bring a mandamus action at their discretion if the City fails to make its required annual contributions, and limits any repayment plans to those that do not “significantly imperil[ ] the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.