Illinois Compiled Statutes
410 ILCS 130/110 (2026)
Suspension; revocation; other penalties for cultivation centers and agents
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 130/110)
Sec. 110. Suspension; revocation; other penalties for cultivation centers and agents. Notwithstanding any other criminal penalties related to the unlawful possession of cannabis, the Department of Agriculture may revoke, suspend, place on probation, reprimand, issue cease and desist orders, refuse to issue or renew a registration, or take any other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action as the Department of Agriculture may deem proper with regard to a registered cultivation center or cultivation center agent, including imposing fines not to exceed $50,000 for each violation, for any violations of this Act and rules adopted under this Act. The procedures for disciplining a registered cultivation center or cultivation center agent and for administrative hearings shall be determined by rule. All final administrative decisions of the Department of Agriculture are subject to judicial review under the Administrative Review Law and its rules. The term "administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(Source: P.A. 98-122, eff. 1-1-14; 98-1172, eff. 1-12-15.) Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Three v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 2017 IL App (1st) 162548 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Three v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 2017 IL App (1st) 162548 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “”)), and sections 110 and 155 that expressly state that final administrative decisions of certain departments are subject to judicial review under the Review Law and its rules (410 ILCS 130/110, 155 (West 2014)). See 410 ILCS 130/110 (West 2014) (“All final administrative…”
Three v. The Dep't of Pub. Health, 2017 IL App (1st) 162548 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “See 410 ILCS 130/110 (West 2014) (“All final administrative decisions of the Department of Agriculture are subject to judicial review under the [Review Law] and its rules.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|