Illinois Compiled Statutes
410 ILCS 525/1 (2026)
This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act"
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 525/1)
(from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 6701)
Sec. 1.
This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "Illinois Health
and Hazardous Substances Registry Act".
(Source: P.A. 83-1361.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2006 · leading case: S. Illinoisan v. Illinois Dep't of Pub. Health, 844 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2006).
S. Illinoisan v. Illinois Dep't of Pub. Health, 844 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2006). “3 The Department argued, inter alia, that because disclosure of the information sought by plaintiff was prohibited by the Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act (Registry Act) (410 ILCS 525/1 et seq. (West 1998)), it was therefore exempt under section 7(l)(a) of…”
S. Illinoisan v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 747 N.E.2d 401 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “The Department raised affirmative defenses, citing the medical studies statute and the Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act (Cancer Registry Act) (410 ILCS 525/1 et seq. (West 1998)). The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings, partial summary…”
May v. Cent. Illinois Pub. Serv. Co., 633 N.E.2d 97 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “On February 2, 1993, contemnor filed for a protective order, asserting that certain documents plaintiffs requested were privileged under the Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act (the Registry Act) (410 ILCS 525/1 et seq. (West 1992)) and the Medical Studies Act…”
S. Illinoisan v. Dep't of Pub. Health Opinion text corrected (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “The Department raised affirmative defenses, citing the medical studies statute and the Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act (Cancer Registry Act) (410 ILCS 525/1 et seq. (West 1998)). The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings, partial summary…”
S. Illinoisian v. Illinois Dep't of Health (Ill. 2006). “3 The Department argued, inter alia, that because disclosure of the information sought by plaintiff was prohibited by the Illinois Health and Hazardous Substances Registry Act (Registry Act) (410 ILCS 525/1 et seq. (West 1998)), it was therefore exempt under section 7(1)(a) of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|