Illinois Compiled Statutes

415 ILCS 5/22.18b (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(415 ILCS 5/22.18b) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1022.18b)
    Sec. 22.18b. (Repealed).
(Source: Repealed by P.A. 88-496.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1993–2016 · leading case: First of Am. Trust Co. v. Armstead, 664 N.E.2d 36 (Ill. 1996).
First of Am. Trust Co. v. Armstead, 664 N.E.2d 36 (Ill. 1996). “) 415 ILCS 5/22.18b (West 1992) (repealed by 415 ILCS 5/57 et seq.”
In Re Marriage of Bonneau, 691 N.E.2d 123 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “2d 36 (finding no vested rights in registering petroleum tanks and receiving compensation under a prior version of the Gasoline Storage Act (415 ILCS 5/22.18b (West 1992)) where the "[p]laintiff had not satisfied the statutory prerequisites so as to create a reasonable…”
Chemrex, Inc. v. Pollution Control Bd., 628 N.E.2d 963 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). · cites it 3× “(ChemRex), of a final order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (Board) affirming an earlier decision by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) denying eligibility for reimbursement from the Underground Storage Tank Fund (Fund) (415 ILCS 5/22.18b(a) (West 1992)…”
Twp. of Harlem v. Env't Prot. Agency, 637 N.E.2d 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “(415 ILCS 5/22.18b(d) (West 1992).) Requiring payment from the fund for claims such as that at issue might well deplete the fund, leaving insufficient money available to pay for the cleanup of far more serious problems.”
OK Trucking Co. v. Armstead, 653 N.E.2d 863 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “(415 ILCS 5/22.18b, 22.18c (West 1992).) An owner or operator of an underground tank became eligible to receive reimbursement for corrective action or indemnification from the Fund only if a series of conditions were met, including the condition that any tank releasing petroleum…”
The Est. of Slightom v. The Pollution Control Bd., 2015 IL App (4th) 140593 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “18c of the Act (415 ILCS 5/22.18b, 22.18c (West 1992)), which had been the law regarding eligibility requirements and disbursements from the LUST Fund as it existed at that time.”
First of Am. Trust Co. v. Armstead, 646 N.E.2d 302 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “(415 ILCS 5/22.18b, 22.18c (West 1992).) An owner or operator of a UST is eligible to receive money from the Fund if the tank has been registered under section 4 of the Gasoline Storage Act (430 ILCS 15/4 (West 1992)).”
The Est. of Slightom v. The Pollution Control Bd., 2015 IL App (4th) 140593 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “18c of the Act (415 ILCS 5/22.18b, 22.18c (West 1992)), which had been the law regarding eligibility requirements and disbursements from the LUST Fund as it existed at that time.”
In re Marriage of Bonneau, 691 N.E.2d 123 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “2d at 293 (finding no vested rights in registering petroleum tanks and receiving compensation under a prior version of the Gasoline Storage Act (415 ILCS 5/22.18b (West 1992)) where the “[pjlaintiff had not satisfied the statutory prerequisites so as to create a reasonable…”
— 415 ILCS 5/22.18b(a) — 1 case
Chemrex, Inc. v. Pollution Control Bd., 628 N.E.2d 963 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “(ChemRex), of a final order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board (Board) affirming an earlier decision by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) denying eligibility for reimbursement from the Underground Storage Tank Fund (Fund) (415 ILCS 5/22.18b(a) (West 1992)…”
— 415 ILCS 5/22.18b(a)(4) — 1 case
OK Trucking Co. v. Armstead, 653 N.E.2d 863 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “(415 ILCS 5/22.18b, 22.18c (West 1992).) An owner or operator of an underground tank became eligible to receive reimbursement for corrective action or indemnification from the Fund only if a series of conditions were met, including the condition that any tank releasing petroleum…”
— 415 ILCS 5/22.18b(d) — 1 case
Twp. of Harlem v. Env't Prot. Agency, 637 N.E.2d 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “(415 ILCS 5/22.18b(d) (West 1992).) Requiring payment from the fund for claims such as that at issue might well deplete the fund, leaving insufficient money available to pay for the cleanup of far more serious problems.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.