Illinois Compiled Statutes
415 ILCS 5/26 (2026)
The Board may adopt such procedural rules as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(415 ILCS 5/26)
(from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1026)
Sec. 26.
The Board may adopt such procedural rules as may be necessary to
accomplish the purposes of this Act. In adopting such rules the Board
shall follow the rulemaking procedures of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act.
Without limiting the generality of this grant of authority, and
notwithstanding any requirement that hearings be held in actions brought
pursuant to Titles VIII and X of the Act, the Board may adopt procedural
rules for resolution of such actions by summary judgment prior to hearing
upon motion by either party except as otherwise required by federal law, as
well as procedural rules requiring the parties to perfect their pleadings
to conform to the evidence as presented to the Board.
(Source: P.A. 85-1048.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2010–2011 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Illinois Pollution Control, 936 N.E.2d 670 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Sierra Club v. Illinois Pollution Control, 936 N.E.2d 670 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Additionally, the Board's rules state that "[a]n adjusted standard has the effect of an environmental regulation that would apply to petitioner, if granted, in lieu of the general regulation that would otherwise be applicable to a petitioner and the regulated community." 35 Ill.…”
Sierra Club v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 2011 IL 110882 (Ill. 2011). “] and Title VII of this Act [415 ILCS 5/26 et seq.] shall not apply to such subsequent determinations.”
Sierra Club v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “Code § 104.400 (2008). Finally, sections 27 and 28.”
Sierra Club v. Ill. Pollution Control Bd., 957 N.E.2d 888 (Ill. 2011). “] and Title VII of this Act [415 ILCS 5/26 et seq. ] shall not apply to *894 such subsequent determinations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|