ILCS » Chapter 415 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

415 ILCS 5/58.1 (2026)

Applicability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(415 ILCS 5/58.1)
    Sec. 58.1. Applicability.
    (a) (1) This Title establishes the procedures for the investigative and remedial activities at sites where there is a release, threatened release, or suspected release of hazardous substances, pesticides, or petroleum and for the review and approval of those activities.
    (2) Any person, including persons required to perform investigations and remediations under this Act, may elect to proceed under this Title unless (i) the site is on the National Priorities List (Appendix B of 40 CFR 300), (ii) the site is a treatment, storage, or disposal site for which a permit has been issued, or that is subject to closure requirements under federal or State solid or hazardous waste laws, (iii) the site is subject to federal or State underground storage tank laws, or (iv) investigation or remedial action at the site has been required by a federal court order or an order issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. To the extent allowed by federal law and regulations, the sites listed under items (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) may utilize the provisions of this Title, including the procedures for establishing risk-based remediation objectives under Section 58.5.
    (b) Except for sites excluded under subdivision (a) (2) of this Section, the Remediation Applicant (RA) for any site that has not received an Agency letter under subsection (y) of Section 4 of this Act may elect to proceed under the provisions of this Title by submitting a written statement of the election to the Agency. In the absence of such election, the RA shall continue under the provisions of this Act as applicable prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act of 1995.
    (c)  Except for sites excluded under subdivision (a)  (2) of this Section, agrichemical facilities may elect to undertake corrective action in conformance with this Title and rules promulgated by the Board thereunder and land application programs administered by the Department of Agriculture as provided under Section 19 of the Illinois Pesticide Act, and shall be eligible for the relief provided under Section 58.10.
(Source: P.A. 89-431, eff. 12-15-95; 89-443, eff. 7-1-96.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2004–2015 · leading case: People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Agpro, Inc., 824 N.E.2d 270 (Ill. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Agpro, Inc., 824 N.E.2d 270 (Ill. 2005). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 2002). Section 58.”
State Oil Co. v. People, 822 N.E.2d 876 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “1(a)(2) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 1996)), titled “Applicability,” precludes Millstream from invoking any of the provisions of Title XVII.”
Vill. of Rockton v. Sonoco Prods. Co., 135 F. Supp. 3d 700 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(l). In general, participation in the SRP consists of several steps, starting with an initial Site Investigation and Site Investigation Report.”
People ex rel. Ryan v. Agpro, Inc. (Ill. 2005). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 2002). Section 58.”
— 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) — 3 cases
People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Agpro, Inc., 824 N.E.2d 270 (Ill. 2005). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 2002). Section 58.”
State Oil Co. v. People, 822 N.E.2d 876 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “1(a)(2) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 1996)), titled “Applicability,” precludes Millstream from invoking any of the provisions of Title XVII.”
People ex rel. Ryan v. Agpro, Inc. (Ill. 2005). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(2) (West 2002). Section 58.”
— 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(l) — 1 case
Vill. of Rockton v. Sonoco Prods. Co., 135 F. Supp. 3d 700 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “” 415 ILCS 5/58.1(a)(l). In general, participation in the SRP consists of several steps, starting with an initial Site Investigation and Site Investigation Report.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.