Illinois Compiled Statutes
420 ILCS 40/2 (2026)
Public policy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(420 ILCS 40/2)
(from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 210-2)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2027)
Sec. 2.
Public policy.
Whereas ionizing radiations and their sources can
be instrumental in the improvement of the health and welfare of the public
if properly utilized, and may be destructive or detrimental to life or
health if carelessly or excessively employed or may detrimentally affect
the environment of the State if improperly utilized, it is hereby declared
to be the public policy of this State to encourage the constructive uses of
radiation and to prohibit and prevent exposure to ionizing radiation in
amounts which are or may be detrimental to health. It is further the policy
to advise, consult and cooperate with other agencies of the State, the
Federal Government, other States and interstate agencies and with affected
groups, political sub-divisions and industries; and, in general, to conform
as nearly as possible to nationally accepted standards in the promulgation
and enforcement of codes, rules and regulations.
(Source: P.A. 86-1341.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1993–2000 · leading case: Stebbings v. Univ. of Chicago, 726 N.E.2d 1136 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000).
Stebbings v. Univ. of Chicago, 726 N.E.2d 1136 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “” 420 ILCS 40/2 (West 1996). We agree that these sources establish a clearly mandated public policy of the protection of the lives and property of citizens from the hazards of radioactive material.”
Adco Servs., Inc. v. Bullard, 628 N.E.2d 772 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “420 ILCS 40/2 (West 1992) (formerly Ill. Rev.”
Stebbings v. Univ. of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “" 420 ILCS 40/2 (West 1996). We agree that these sources establish a clearly mandated public policy of the protection of the lives and property of citizens from the hazards of radioactive material.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|