430 ILCS 65/0.01
Short title
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(430 ILCS 65/0.01)
(from Ch. 38, par. 83-0.1)
Sec. 0.01.
Short title.
This Act may be cited as the
Firearm Owners Identification Card Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58
cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. (2004)
“(2000) (Gun Control Act); 430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 2002) (Firearm Owners Identification Card Act).”
Caulkins v. Pritzker (2023)
“See 430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 2022). ¶ 68 A FOID card applicant must submit to the Illinois State Police evidence of eligibility, based on his or her age, citizenship, criminal history, and several other factors.”
Young v. Bryco Arms (2004)
“Plaintiffs have not alleged that any defendant has violated an applicable statute or ordinance governing the manufacture or sale of firearms or that the laws permitting defendants to engage in the businesses of manufacturing or selling firearms are themselves invalid.”
People v. Mosley (2015)
“¶ 43 Due Process Violations ¶ 44 We also reject defendant’s argument that, under due process, subsection (a)(3)(C) and the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Card Act) (430 ILCS 65/0.01 (West 2012)) are unconstitutional, both facially and as applied.”
People v. Cervantes (1999)
“Article 50 also amended the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Act) (430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)) to require that each FOID card applicant certify that he or she is not an illegal alien and to provide the State Police the authority to deny an application for a…”
People v. Davis (1997)
“Justice NICKELS delivered the opinion of the court: We here decide the constitutionality of the statutory penalty for felons who violate the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 1994)). The circuit court of Cook County found that the statutory…”
People v. Mosley (2015)
“- 15 - ¶ 43 Due Process Violations ¶ 44 We also reject defendant’s argument that, under due process, subsection (a)(3)(C) and the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Card Act) (430 ILCS 65/0.01 (West 2012)) are unconstitutional, both facially and as applied.”
People v. Burns (2024)
“430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 2022). The FOID Card Act requires a person seeking to acquire or possess a firearm to obtain a FOID card from the Illinois State Police.”
People v. Davis (2023)
“2 Defendant told police that he did not have a valid Firearm Owners Identification card (see 430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 2022)) or a concealed carry license (see 430 ILCS 66/1 et seq.”
Kevin Culp v. Kwame Raoul (2019)
“And the Illinois Firearm Owners Identification Card Act, 430 ILCS 65/0.01 to 65/16-3, allows out-of-state res- idents who are authorized to possess a firearm in their home state to do the same in Illinois while on their own premises or in the home of an Illinois resident with…”
People v. Clifton (2019)
“(West 2012)) to the hyper technical definitions of “firearm” in the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Card Act) (430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq. (West 2012)) creates tension with well-established precedent allowing proof of a firearm on a single lay witness’s testimony.”
Guns Save Life, Inc. v. Raoul (2020)
“(hereinafter GSL), filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, on behalf of its members, against defendants, Kwame Raoul and Brendan Kelly, in their official capacities, alleging that the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (FOID Act) (430 ILCS 65/0.01 et seq.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|